The CSPAN video indicates a run time of 57 minutes.
VPR News has a description of the speech and a transcript link. Unfortunately, that is not a transcript of the speech, it does include a few quotes. The video I found is high definition, and loads too slow on my connection. I can't pause and rewind it, so I can't create an accurate transcript.
Ahh, the fine print. I finally found the well concealed transcript link. The transcript is in the form of a 20 page pdf file.
Brennan tells how he previously outlined the new administration's policy, identifying two principle challenges.
- First, the immediate near-term challenge of destroying al-Qaida and its extremist affiliates.
- And second, the longer-term challenge of confronting violent extremism generally, including the political, economic and social forces that can sometimes put individuals on the path toward militancy.
The doctrines which sanctify and mandate aggressive world conquest are found in the Qur'an: Al-Baqarah 216 makes it mandatory, not optional. Al-Anfal 39 commands Muslims to fight pagans until all resistance ceases and Allah has a monopoly. Muslims and their apologists will swear that those verses don't mean that, are taken out of context, misapplied, mistranslated and misinterpreted. Ibn Kathir, who spent his adult life studying and teaching the Qur'an & hadith, has a different take on those verses and Moe confirmed their obvious meaning. The final clincher: Islamic law codifies them.
- Jihad is required in all Conditions
- The Order to fight to eradicate Shirk and Kufr
- The Order to fight People of the Scriptures until They give the Jizyah
- Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387
- http://www.crusadersarmory.co.cc/RelianceO9-8.html The caliph makes war on Jews... codification of 9:29.
- http://www.crusadersarmory.co.cc/RelianceO9-9.html The caliph fights all other people... codification of 8:39.
Brennan goes on to tell us how President Obama is clear about the threat we face, following up with a weak excuse for his misidentification of the enemy.
Terrorism is a tactic, a fact so obvious as to require no restatement. "jihadist" & "islamists" are smokescreens commonly used to divert our attention from the real enemy: Muslims; Islam's true believers. The last clause in the quote is a form of kitman: dissimulation by obfuscation. Brennan intentionally conflates jihad an-Nafs with jihad asghar, to the exclusion of the effective definition. To make the extent of Brennan's deception clear to you, I will quote two relevant definitions of jihad. The first is from the translator's notes to Surah Al-Baqarah 190. That ayeh is related to defensive jihad, when Dar ul-Islam is invaded, but the definition is not, it relates to offensive jihad on Islamic initiative. I can't explain their placement of the footnote, I just report it.
Narrated ‘Abdullâh bin Mas‘ûd رضي الله عنه: I asked Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم "O Allâh’s Messenger! What is the best deed?" He replied, "To offer the Salât (prayers) at their early fixed stated times." I asked, "What is next in goodness?" He replied, "To be good and dutiful to your parents." I further asked, "What is next in goodness?" He replied, "To participate in Jihâd in Allâh’s Cause." I did not ask Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم anymore and if I had asked him more, he would have told me more. (Sahih Al-Bukhâri, Vol.4, Hadîth No.41).
Let that sink in for a moment, then re-read it until it becomes clear to you. The second definition is from Islamic law: Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9.0. It does not have named anchors for linking, but it is documented here: http://www.crusadersarmory.co.cc/RelianceO9-0.html .
Chapter O9.0: Jihad
(O: Jihad means to war against non-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada signifying warfare to establish the religion. And it is the lesser jihad. As for the greater jihad, it is spiritual warfare against the lower self (nafs), which is why the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said as he was returning from jihad.
``We have returned from the lesser jihad to the greater jihad.''
The scriptural basis for jihad, prior to scholarly consensus (def: b7) is such Koranic verses as:
-1- ``Fighting is prescribed for you'' (Koran 2:216);
-2- ``Slay them wherever you find them'' (Koran 4:89);
-3- ``Fight the idolators utterly'' (Koran 9:36);
and such hadiths as the one related by Bukhari and Muslim that the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said:
``I have been commanded to fight people until they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and perform the prayer, and pay zakat. If they say it, they have saved their blood and possessions from me, except for the rights of Islam over them. And their final reckoning is with Allah'';
and the hadith reported by Muslim,
``To go forth in the morning or evening to fight in the path of Allah is better than the whole world and everything in it.''Details concerning jihad are found in the accounts of the military expeditions of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), including his own martial forays and those on which he dispatched others. The former consist of the ones he personally attended, some twenty-seven (others say twenty-nine) of them. He fought in eight of them, and killed only one person with his noble hand, Ubayy ibn Khalaf, at the battle of Uhud. On the latter expeditions he sent others to fight, himself remaining at Medina, and these were forty-seven in number.) [Emphasis and links added.]
Will you kill anyone else or be killed in your struggle against your ego? How?? I have added emphasis to Surah At-Taubah 111 to make things clear for you.
Like Obama, Brennan knows no shame, there is no limit to his deception.
I added emphasis to one word in that quote to make it stand out because it illustrates one of the methods by which Muslims and their apologists practice deception. Who is innocent? By definition, only Muslims can be innocent. Surah Al-Ma'idah' 33 lists the punishments prescribed for those who wage war against Allah. Ibn Kathir's Tafsir defines that term. "`Wage war' mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways. " [Emphasis added.] If you do not believe in Allah, you are rebelling against him, not innocent.
If you did not follow the link to Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387, when I presented it earlier, do it now. What makers our blood sacred to Muslims, so that they can't kill us with impunity? Why does Islam forbid killing women and children in combat? Only because they are "property for Muslims". If you still harbor doubts, read this: http://www.crusadersarmory.co.cc/RelianceO9-13.html.
The lies keep flowing.
True, we have not declared war on Islam, but we need to because Islam declared and is waging war against us. Evidently Brennan is not aware of the Barbary Wars. The Barbary Pirates were Muslims, who attacked our shipping for economic reasons, using the Qur'an as a rationalization. Wikipedia has the details for you.
Right and duty to plunder and enslave--where did they get such an idea? I will quote a fragment from Sahih Bukhari 4.53.386: "Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:-- "Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master."".
Brennan, like President Obama, believes that we are stupid, ignorant, gullible fools incapable of reasoning.
The president’s strategy is unequivocal with regard to our posture. The United States of America is at war. We are at war against al-Qaida and its terrorist affiliates. That is why the president is responsibly ending the war in Iraq, which had nothing to do with 9/11 and why he has refocused our efforts on Afghanistan, where al-Qaida continues to plot from the tribal regions along the border with Pakistan and inside of Pakistan.
We have a clear mission. We will not simply degrade al-Qaida.'s capabilities or simply prevent terrorist attacks against our country or citizens. We will not merely respond after the fact, after an attack that has been attempted. Instead, the United States will disrupt, dismantle and ensure a lasting defeat of al-Qaida and violent extremist affiliates.
Once they tell a lie, they repeat it, believing as the Nazis did, that repetition will bring about wide spread belief. Al-Qaida is not a separate organization, it is an alias for Islam. It is one of the branches of the Muslim Brotherhood. Another branch of al-Iqhwan has in their charter, words which expose the awful reality which Brennan & Obama wish we would never learn about.
Arrogant narcissists can't stop lying.
We can't build partnerships with Muslims because Allah explicitly forbids it. I will quote one of several ayat which make this fact clear to those willing to read and learn.
Arrogant narcissists repeatedly return to their favorite lies.
Through a renewed commitment to diplomacy and in contrast to terrorists who offer the false hope of change through violence, we seek to show that legitimate grievances can be resolved peacefully through democratic institutions and dialogue, whether in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan or between Israelis and Palestinians, where the continuing conflict undermines moderates and strengthens extremists across the region.
'Violent extremism" is a lie. Moe set the standard for Islam in all places, at all times with his recitation & Sunnah. You need to read the Qur'an & hadith to learn what that standard is. In the last 9 years of his life, Moe started 86 battles. Does that give you a clue?
Jihad is about obedience to Allah & emulation of Moe, not "legitimate grievances". The Falestinians do not have legitimate grievances, Israel has them: repeated conquests, including that of Caliph Umar in 638 deprived the Jews of their homeland. Their legitimate grievance had a hope of redress when the Balfour Declaration was published. Hope turned to frustration when Britain reneged, giving most of their patrimony to the Hasemites.
Since 1948 Muslims have been attempting genocide and politicide against Israel. That gives Israel the right to defend herself, which does not give rise to legitimate Falestinian grievances.
The same old lie rears its ugly head again.
Muslims are explicitly forbidden to take kuffar as partners. Muslims must be dominant, not submissive in any relationship. We can not foster good governance, because Islam is feudalism. Only Allah and his messenger have the right to rule, and their rule must be extended over the entire globe. If you could make them prosperous, you would only enable them to build and equip larger armies with which to attack us.
Repetition does not convert a lie into truth.
The ideology belongs to Islam, not to any sub-set. "Only Allah has the right to be worshiped.". That is the idea at the base of the system, the bedrock foundation. Allah's word must be "made superior", that is, dominant. Supremacy is gained through armed conquest. Muslims are obligated to conquer and subjugate the entire world. That is fard al-kifaya, binding upon all able bodied adult male Muslims until a sufficient number have reported to the front. Jihad must be undertaken in every year, failing only when there is insufficient manpower or material.
Common sense dictates that predators must be eradicated. Because Islam is a predator, it must be eradicated. Because President Obama is a Muslim, he can not acknowledge that reality. Because President Bush was in the purse of the Saudi's, he could not acknowledge that reality. The fatal fact is that we can never obtain peace or security while there is Islam on this earth. Obama and Brennan can not acknowledge that fatal fact.
Please explain to me how a "small band of cowards" conquered an empire that extended from the border of China to the border of France. How the Hell did a tiny minority raise an army willing and able to conquer India? Explain to me how they slaughtered up to 90 million Hindus. Explain how, in less than 1400 years, they slaughtered 270*106 people.
It is not al-Qaida. It is not "terrorists". It is not "extremists". It is not "radicals". It is believers: Muslims who bought the evil of Islam hook, line and sinker [8:2, 9:111, 24:62, 49:15 ]. If we don't get them out of this country and off of this planet, we will never have peace and security and we will eventually be conquered and enslaved. This is a reality that our cowardly politicians can not acknowledge because that acknowledgment would subject them to charges of advocacy of genocide. Either Muslims cease believing or cease living or we will cease being alive and free.
We must ship them home and prevent more from entering. We must either break Allah's yoke of slavery and cause them to become apostates or usher them into Hell. Otherwise they will torment us until they prevail, then they will enslave us.
This is not a legal issue. This is not a moral issue. This is an existential issue: will the flag yet wave, will this continue to be the land of the free and home of the brave or the prison of the craven slave?
When Nazis landed by submarine, FDR knew what to do with them. Muslims are arriving by commercial aviation, and Obama can't figure out what to do with them. The fires of violent Islam are stoked by the Qur'an, hadith and kutbah delivered at Juma Salat in every Mosque. When stung by hornets, you destroy the nest and its occupants with chemical warfare. The same logic applies in this case. When defense is considered provocative, it must be preemptive. There is no rational alternative. Overwhelming, disproportionate force is required.
Those arrogant traitors who mislead and misrule this nation talk of "inflaming" and "recruiting". If they were honest, they would tell us about the obligation of Jihad. When Muslims attack kuffar, the obligation is fard al-kifaya: binding on all eligible male Muslims until a sufficient number answer the call. When we retaliate, the obligation becomes fard ayn, binding on the entire Muslim community for immediate response.
American Thinker has an excellent article about Brennan's speech, here is their conclusion.