OIC: United Stand Against Intolerance ?

OIC: United Stand Against Intolerance ?
Last March, the HRC passed a new resolution which was said to abandon the nefarious "defamation of religions" concept, substituting "negative stereotyping" & "incitement".  That is the official position; divergent from objective factual reality. The distinction is without difference, and the amended verbiage is persiflage.

    That fact is exposed by a March 24 address to the HRC by Mr. Zamir Akram, Pakistan's Ambassador.   He made it clear that the new resolution does not abrogate previous resolutions, instead, it confirms them.  His speech is dissected in detail here.

Mr. President: this resolution addresses a number of issues over which the OIC has been expressing concern over the years. having said  that, I wish to state categorically that this resolution does not replace earlier resolutions on combating  defamation. which were adopted by the Human Rights Council  and remain valid.  This resolution L.38  is an attempt on the part of the oic to build consensus on an issue of vital importance not only to Muslims but to people of all religions  and beliefs by identifying  ways and means to deal with the growing problems of religious incitement and discrimination and incitement to hatred and violence based on religion or belief.

    The Secretary General of the OIC also addressed the HRC on the subject of the new resolution. 

OIC has a principled postition against defamation of any  religion, dehumanization of the followers or denigration of symbols  sacred   to  all     religions.    The  developments  including the ban of construction of minarets, the attempts towards burning of Qur'an and the use of Islamophobia
as an instrument of electoral politics are ominous.  There is an urgent need to initiate and sustain what I would like to term as ‘preventive  cultural    diplomacy’.   We   need  to  move beyond  event based calls for action to create spaces for structured engagement   The Human Rights   framework provides with a concrete basis for this engagement.   We believe that tbe workshops on incitement to hatred under the Durban mandate constitute and important avenue for a synthesis  aimed at bridging the divergence of views.

    The Secretary General has spoken out again, this time uttering & publishing a lie so egregious that it must be refuted immediately.  It is necessary to rub his snout in his mess of deception.

 "The OIC has never sought to limit freedom of expression, give Islam preferential treatment, curtail creativity or allow discrimination against religious minorities in Muslim countries. "

•  never sought to limit freedom of expression
  • OIC Secretary-General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu expressed his dismay and disappointment at the release of the book despite the fact that he, and some leaders of Muslim countries, had personally written letters to the foreign minister of Denmark, urging the Danish government to stop the publication of the book because of its highly provocative and inciting content.[Khaleej Times Habib Shaikh]
  • Tajikistan, current chair of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) has sent an official request to the UN to pressure Norway to stop publication of a reprint of the book with scandalous cartoons featuring the prophet Mohammed. [...] The letter, addressed to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, voices the concern of 57 members of the OIC and calls on the UN to “take measures against” the plan, reports Interfax. [http://rt.com/news/islamic-un-stop-cartoons/] 
  • "Pakistan said it told the Dutch ambassador that it was incumbent on the Netherlands to prosecute Mr Wilders for defamation and deliberately hurting Muslim sentiments, the official Associated Press of Pakistan news agency reported."[BBC News]

    For the benefit of those suffering from anal cranial juxtaposition, I will clear away the chaff:

• never sought to limit freedom of expression
  • urging the Danish government to stop the publication
  • pressure Norway to stop publication
  • told the Dutch ambassador
    • to prosecute Mr Wilders

    From the viewpoint of a rational and honest person, Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu is a damned liar, having deliberately made an egregiously untrue statement.  From the Islamic point of view, he is not a liar because Islam does not recognize disbelievers as human, denying our rights. They can not violate our freedom of expression because we have none. Human rights do not apply to us in their point of view.  The sanctity of life is conditioned on being Muslim.

[...]And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah[...] [Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387]

    Having exposed the most egregious deception, I will continue fisking this screed, which is being widely propagated. I perceive that this and related articles are the first wave of a tsunami of pressure focused on the next General Assembly session beginning September 20. 

    As is my habit with target rich environments, I will link my comments to superscripts in the text. Click the superscripts to read the comments and use your Backspace key to return to the text. 

Norway attacks reinforce need for united stand against intolerance Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu

Istanbul, Turkey - The horrific and tragic incident that happened in Norway reminds us again of the importance of combating religious intolerance1 and promoting cultural understanding2. Anti-Islam and anti-Muslim attitudes and activities3, known as Islamophobia, are increasingly finding place in the agenda of ultra-right wing4 political parties and civil societies in the West in their anti-immigrant5 and anti-multiculturalism6 policies, as was evident in the manifesto of the Norway killer7. Their views8 are being promoted under the banner of freedom of expression9 while claiming that Muslims do not respect that right. A few days before the Norway attack, on 15 July in Istanbul, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and the United States agreed to a united stand on “[c]ombating intolerance10, negative stereotyping11 and stigmatization of12, and discrimination13, incitement to violence14, and violence against persons based on religion or belief15” through the implementation of UN Human Rights Council Resolution 16/18. The meeting – co-chaired by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and myself, with the attendance of the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs together with the foreign ministers and officials of OIC member states and Western countries, as well as international organisations – reaffirmed the commitment of the participants to the effective implementation of the measures set in the resolution.16 This was a major step towards strengthening the foundations of tolerance and respect for religious diversity17 as well as enhancing the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms around the world18. The OIC, which was the initiator of Resolution 16/18, worked in close cooperation in the drafting process with the United States and the European Union in bringing about a breakthrough on 21 March. The 2011 HRC resolution is a genuine effort to usher in an era of understanding on the issue of religious intolerance. It gives the widest margin of freedom of expression, and reiterates the rejection of discrimination, incitement and stereotyping used by the other or against the symbols of the followers of religions. 19 The OIC has never sought to limit freedom of expression, give Islam preferential treatment, curtail creativity or allow discrimination against religious minorities in Muslim countries. The Islamic faith is based on tolerance and acceptance of other religions. It does not condone discrimination of human beings on the basis of caste, creed, colour or faith20. It falls on all the OIC member states as a sacred duty to protect the lives and property of their non-Muslim citizens and to treat them without discrimination of any form. Those elements who seek to harm or threaten minority citizens must be subjected to law. Our strong stand condemning violence perpetrated against non-Muslims whether in Iraq, Egypt or Pakistan has been consistent. No one has the right to insult another for their beliefs or to incite hatred and prejudice. That kind of behaviour is irresponsible and uncivilised. We also cannot overlook the fact that the world is diverse. The Western perception on certain issues would differ from those held by others. We need to be sensitive and appreciative of this reality, more so when it comes to criticising or expressing views on issues related to religion and culture. 21 The publication of offensive cartoons of the Prophet six years ago that sparked outrage across the Muslim world, the publicity around the film Fitna and the more recent Qur’an burnings represent incidents of incitement to hatred22 that fuel an atmosphere of dangerous mutual suspicion. Freedom of expression has to be exercised with responsibility23. At the same time, violent reactions to provocations are also irresponsible and uncivilised and we condemn them unequivocally. It is not enough to pass resolutions and laws against religious incitement. We should also be diligent in launching more initiatives and measures towards better intercultural dialogue and understanding at all levels – the political, social, business, media, academic and religious. Resolution 16/18 includes an eight-point approach that calls for various measures to foster tolerance, including developing collaborative networks to build mutual understanding and constructive action, creating appropriate mechanisms within the government to identify and address potential areas of tension between members of religious communities, and raising awareness at the local, national and international levels on the effects of negative religious stereotyping and incitement to religious hatred. The implementation of the 2011 HRC Resolution 16/1824 would take us a long way in making our world a more peaceful and harmonious place to live in. ### * Professor Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu is the Secretary General of the Jeddah-based Organization of Islamic Cooperation (formerly Organization of the Islamic Conference), an international organisation consisting of 57 member states. This article was written for the Common Ground News Service (CGNews). Source: Common Ground News Service (CGNews), 16 August 2011, www.commongroundnews.org Copyright permission is granted for publication.

• Search: "Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu"+ "stop publication"
  • Results: 35
    •   Khaleej Times Habib Shaikh [Emphasis added.]

      2 October 2010 JEDDAH — The Organisation of the Islamic Conference has condemned the publication of the book Tyranny of Silence in Denmark.
      The book, containing blasphemous caricatures, hit the stores in Denmark on Thursday amid concerns over a backlash from the Muslim world.

      The cartoons were first published by the Jyllands-Posten newspaper in 2005, resulting in condemnation from Muslims around the world.

      OIC Secretary-General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu expressed his dismay and disappointment at the release of the book despite the fact that he, and some leaders of Muslim countries, had personally written letters to the foreign minister of Denmark, urging the Danish government to stop the publication of the book because of its highly provocative and inciting content. [...] Emphasising the moral responsibility of the political leadership of Denmark, Ihsanoglu said the publication of the book was a deliberate attempt to incite prejudice and animosity. This would undermine the ongoing efforts of the international community to promote understanding and peaceful coexistence among people of diverse religious and cultural backgrounds.

    • http://rt.com/news/islamic-un-stop-cartoons/Tajikistan, current chair of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) has sent an official request to the UN to pressure Norway to stop publication of a reprint of the book with scandalous cartoons featuring the prophet Mohammed. [...] The letter, addressed to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, voices the concern of 57 members of the OIC and calls on the UN to “take measures against” the plan, reports Interfax.

---

1. Religious intolerance indeed. We must tolerate Islam, but Islam is not obligated to tolerate Judaism or Christianity. Tolerance is a one way street 
* whoever seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never be accepted [3:85}
* fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. [8:39]
* those who disbelieve, and die while they are disbelievers, it is they on whom is the Curse of Allâh and of the angels and of mankind[2:161]
2. Cultural understanding, yeah, right. They do not want us to understand Islam, they want us to accept a false image; a web of lies spun by Islam and its apologists. What passes for cultural understanding is really kitman: deception by obfuscation.
3. Translation: resistance: Kuffar attempting to defend themselves and their culture. Phobia implies irrational fear and loathing. There is nothing irrational about loathing an institution which has a 1400 year track record of genocide, murdering an estimated 270*10⁶  people. 
4. The VVP is not Nazi or fascist, it is democratic. The Secretary General is using loaded words as a smear tactic.  
5. The Immigrants in question are primarily Muslims, living as parasites on the state and breeding like rats. They tend to rape, riot and block the streets raising their butts to the moon. Whats not to oppose about that?
6. Multiculturalism is the idea that an inferior culture which dominates women, assaults Queers, rapes indigenous girls, declares superiority, refuses to assimilate, threatens war, supports terrorism and constantly escalates its demands is equal to Western Civilization. Whats not to oppose about suicidal idiocy?
7. Breivert's Manifesto discusses 'martyrdom operations'. "Yes, for certain religious members,
   certain measures are obviously in violation to biblical teachings but the amount of grace
   and divine goodwill generated at the point where you sacrifice everything (in the
   martyrdom operation) will provide you with an abundance of it, which will more than
   nullify any minor or serious sins committed prior to operation." [pg. 846] On page 849 he lists three pieces of music to be played during 'martyrdom operations'.  It is obvious that Breivert adopted enemy doctrine & tactics. It is obvious that he is not sane. While objective facts reproduced in the manifesto remain true and accepted by others, the manifesto is his alone. The manifesto is violent, see pages 1028 & 1344; rational resistance is educational and political, not violent. Ihsanoglu is engaging in smear tactics, attempting to tar others with Breivert's violence.
8. Our views of Islam are founded on facts discovered in Islam's canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis & jurisprudence.  Check out ICCPR, Article 19. §1 guarantees the right to hold opinions. §2 guarantees freedom of expression.  The spewers of feces assert that rights are interdependent and cling bitterly to exaggerated ideas of Article 20.
9. In America we have the Declaration of Independence; God gave us the right to live;  & Bill of rights. "Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech." If prohibited from truthfully communicating warning of approaching danger, we would be rendered defenseless. We perceive Islam to be a threat because of its declaration & prosecution of perpetual war.
   • 2:216
   • 8:39
   • 9:29
   • 9:111
   • 9:123
   • 47:4
   • 61:4
   • 61:10-11
   • Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 53, Number 386
   • Tafsir Ibn Kathir  The Good News that Muslims will conquer the Known World, and ultimately the Entire World
   • Reliance of the Traveller, O9.8
   • Risala
   • Hedaya


10. If they were sincere about combating intolerance, they would outlaw the Qur'an because it inculcates intolerance.  Is there anything more intolerant than declaring us the worst of living creatures, cursing us and declaring perpetual war against us? 
11. When we share the facts outlined in point 9 above, we are accused of negative stereotyping. Exposing the fact that Allah commands Muslims to wage war against us, Moe confirmed the imperative & implemented it and Islamic law codifies it is not negative stereotyping, it is revealing objective factual reality. It does not mean that every Muslim is violent, it means that Islam requires every Muslim to pray for, pay for and or participate in aggressive conquest. 
12. Should being a made member of the Mafia carry a stigma? Why then should membership in Moe's war cult not carry a stigma? 
13. Should members of the Mafia be subject to discrimination? Should they be closely observed; suspected of criminal activity? Why then should members of the cult which sanctifies & celebrates terrorism not be suspected, observed and excluded from our societies? 
14. If incitement were to be combated, the Qur'an would be outlawed. Of course, that is not the intention of the resolution's authors and few will read 8:65, 9:38-39, 9:123 & 61:10-12 to learn why it should be. The Motoons simply depicted Moe as a terrorist, which, by his own admission, he was. They did not suggest that viewers should assault or wage war upon Muslims. The associated violence was incited by Imams in Mosques, not by the cartoonists or publisher.  Fitna, the short documentary by Geert Wilders, displayed the incitement contained in the Qur'an, which flows through Mosques.  Fitna did not incite violence, Imams did, resulting in riots.  They are demanding that all criticism of Islam be outlawed, twisting and perverting language in the process.

CNN.Com's European outlet has a reminder of what the Secretary General said about Fitna, the documentary video by Geert Wilders.

• "The film was a deliberate act of discrimination against Muslims" that aimed to "provoke unrest and intolerance,"
  

BBC News informs us that Pakistan demanded prosecution.

"Pakistan said it told the Dutch ambassador that it was incumbent on the Netherlands to prosecute Mr Wilders for defamation and deliberately hurting Muslim sentiments, the official Associated Press of Pakistan news agency reported."

Wikipedia helps us to review the UN position.

After the release of the film, a number of international organizations released statements or otherwise responded to the film. United Nations' Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon stated on on March 28, 2008 that

I condemn, in the strongest terms, the airing of Geert Wilders’ offensively anti-Islamic film. There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence. The right of free expression is not at stake here. I acknowledge the efforts of the Government of the Netherlands to stop the broadcast of this film, and appeal for calm to those understandably offended by it. Freedom must always be accompanied by social responsibility.^[133][134]

1. If they really gave a damn about violence against persons based on their religion, they would be acting to protect Christians in Muslim dominated areas of Iraq, Egypt, Pakistan, Indonesia, Kenya, Nigeria and other places where Christians are bombed, shot, burned and hacked to death with impunity.  
2. If there was any possibility of balanced & effective implementation the resolution, no Muslim would vote for it because it would require the outlawing of Islam. 
3. Tolerance respect for diversity? Really? Yeah, right. "Truly, the religion with Allâh is Islâm". "Allâh! Lâ ilahâ illa Huwa (none has the right to be worshipped but He), "
   

   -6- are forbidden to openly display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their funerals and feastdays;

   -7- and are forbidden to build new churches.

4. What right is more fundamental than the right to life?  "then kill the Mushrikûn (see V.2:105) wherever you find them, and capture them and besiege them, and prepare for them each and every ambush." "It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land." Get a clue: our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims.
5. The sentence is unmitigated hypocrisy. What did Ban Ki-moon say about Fitna? Something about "hate speech" & "incitement". Oh, yes, he said that freedom of expression was "not involved:.   Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu  called it a "deliberate act of discrimination"  intended to "provoke unrest and intolerance.  Reality check: Fitna shows the  violent Qur'an verses side by side with the Imams who  invoke them and the resulting riots.  Describing is not doing.  
6. Like most Muslim screeds, this one is redundant. One lie must be pointed out: discrimination. Reliance of the Traveller is Islamic law. This provision affects conquered Jews & Christians.

   O11.5

   Such non-Muslim subjects are obliged to comply with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety and indemnity of life, reputation, and property. In addition, they:

   -1- are penalized for committing adultery or theft, thought not for drunkenness;

   -2- are distinguished from Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar);

   -3- are not greeted with "as-Salamu 'alaykum";

   -4- must keep to the side of the street;

   -5- may not build higher than or as high as the Muslims' buildings, though if they acquire a tall house, it is not razed;

   -6- are forbidden to openly display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their funerals and feastdays;

   -7- and are forbidden to build new churches.

   O11.6

   They are forbidden to reside in the Hijaz, meaning the area and towns around Mecca, Medina, and Yamama, for more than three days when the caliph allows them to enter there for something they need).

   O11.7

   A non-Muslim may not enter the Meccan Sacred Precinct (Haram) under any circumstances, or enter any other mosque without permission (A: nor may Muslims enter churches without their permission).

7. Diversity, yeah, right.  Because there is more than one "religion" in the world, we must not mention the fact that one of them is a war cult, hellbent on conquering us, not a legitimate religion. 
8. Incitement to hatred? Muhammad bragged about being made victorious with terror. Allah declared that he would cast terror. Allah declared that he cast terror, resulting in the death of the men of a Jewish settlement and the enslavement of their widows and orphans. The fatal facts of Islam are truly worthy of hatred and contempt but exposing them is not incitement.  
9. Those of us who have become familiar with the damnable doctrines & practices of Islam have a responsibility to share our knowledge with our fellows and to encourage them to read Islam's canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis & jurisprudence.  There is no responsibility to be silent or soft pedal the truth. 
10. Examine the resolution's call to action :

    5. Notes the speech given by Secretary-General of the Organization of the Islamic Conference at the fifteenth session of the Human Rights Council, and draws on his call on States to take the following actions to foster a domestic environment of religious tolerance, peace and respect, by:

    (a) Encouraging the creation of collaborative networks to build mutual understanding, promoting dialogue and inspiring constructive action towards shared policy goals and the pursuit of tangible outcomes, such as servicing projects in the fields of education, health, conflict prevention, employment, integration and media education;

    (b) Creating an appropriate mechanism within Governments to, inter alia, identify and address potential areas of tension between members of different religious communities, and assisting with conflict prevention and mediation;

    (c) Encouraging training of Government officials in effective outreach strategies;

    (d) Encouraging the efforts of leaders to discuss within their communities the causes of discrimination, and evolving strategies to counter these causes;

    (e) Speaking out against intolerance, including advocacy of religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence;

    (f) Adopting measures to criminalize incitement to imminent violence based on religion or belief; {Review the definitions implicit in criticisms of Fitna and the Motoons!!!}
    

    (g) Understanding the need to combat denigration and negative religious stereotyping of persons, as well as incitement to religious hatred, by strategizing and harmonizing actions at the local, national, regional and international levels through, inter alia, education and awareness-building;  {Indoctrination.}
    

    (h) Recognizing that the open, constructive and respectful debate of ideas, as well as interfaith and intercultural dialogue at the local, national and international levels, can play a positive role in combating religious hatred, incitement and violence;

    6. Calls upon all States:

    (a) To take effective measures to ensure that public functionaries in the conduct of their public duties do not discriminate against an individual on the basis of religion or belief;

    (b) To foster religious freedom and pluralism by promoting the ability of members of all religious communities to manifest their religion, and to contribute openly and on an equal footing to society;

    (c) To encourage the representation and meaningful participation of individuals, irrespective of their religion, in all sectors of society;

    (d) To make a strong effort to counter religious profiling, which is understood to be the invidious use of religion as a criterion in conducting questionings, searches and other law enforcement investigative procedures;

    7. Encourages States to consider providing updates on efforts made in this regard as part of ongoing reporting to the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights;

    8. Calls upon States to adopt measures and policies to promote the full respect for and protection of places of worship and religious sites, cemeteries and shrines, and to take measures in cases where they are vulnerable to vandalism or destruction;

    9. Calls for strengthened international efforts to foster a global dialogue for the promotion of a culture of tolerance and peace at all levels, based on respect for human rights and diversity of religions and beliefs, and decides to convene a panel discussion on this issue at its seventeenth session, within existing resources.

Obamination: Jobs

Obamination: Jobs Obamination addressed the nation about jobs. Sort of like someone who administered poison telling you how to get well. The time has come to tell him, his administration and their enablers in Congress to go to Hell. If we won't tell them, who will?  Lets not wait until November 6, 2012; lets do it immediately.

    The superscripts in the prepared remarks are linked to my contumacious comments, which follow. You can click the superscripts to read the relevant comment, then use your Backspace key to return to your place in the text.

Remarks of President Barack Obama
As Prepared for Delivery
Saturday, August 13, 2011
Washington, DC

On Thursday, I visited a new, high-tech factory in Michigan where workers are helping America lead the way in a growing clean energy industry. 

They were proud of their work, and they should be.  They’re not just showing us a path¹ out of the worst recession in generations – they’re proving that this is still a country where we make things²; where new ideas take root and grow; where the best universities, most creative entrepreneurs, and most dynamic businesses in the world call home³.  They’re proving that even in difficult times, there’s not a country on Earth that wouldn’t trade places with us. 

That doesn’t mean we don’t face some very tough economic challenges.  Many Americans are hurting badly right now.  Many have been unemployed for too long.  Putting these men and women back to work, and growing wages for everyone, has got to be our top priority⁴.

But lately, the response from Washington has been partisanship and gridlock⁵ that’s only undermined public confidence and hindered our efforts to grow the economy.

So while there’s nothing wrong with our country, there is something wrong with our politics⁶, and that’s what we’ve got to fix.  Because we know there are things Congress can do⁷, right now, to get more money back in your pockets, get this economy growing faster, and get our friends and neighbors back to work. 

The payroll tax cut that put $1,000 back in the average family’s pocket this year?⁸  Let’s extend it.  Construction workers who’ve been jobless since the housing boom went bust?  Let’s put them back to work rebuilding America.⁹  Let’s cut red tape in the patent process so entrepreneurs can get good ideas to market more quickly.  Let’s finish trade deals so we can sell more American-made goods around the world.¹⁰  Let’s connect the hundreds of thousands of brave Americans coming home from Iraq and Afghanistan to businesses that need their incredible¹¹ skills and talents.

These are all things we can do right now.  So let’s do them.  And over the coming weeks, I’ll put forward more proposals¹² to help our businesses hire and create jobs, and won’t stop until every American who wants a job can find one.

But we can no longer let partisan brinksmanship get in our way – the idea that making it through the next election is more important than making things right.  That’s what’s holding us back – the fact that some in Congress¹³ would rather see their opponents lose than see America win.

So you’ve got a right to be frustrated.  I am.  Because you deserve better.  And I don’t think it’s too much for you to expect that the people you send to this town start delivering.¹⁴

Members of Congress are at home in their districts right now.  And if you agree with me – whether you’re a Democrat or a Republican or not much of a fan of either – let them know.

If you’ve had it with gridlock, and you want them to pass stalled bills that will help our economy right now – let them know¹⁵. 

If you refuse to settle for a politics where scoring points is more important than solving problems; if you believe it’s time to put country before party and the interests of our children before our own – let them know. 

And maybe they’ll get back to Washington ready to compromise, ready to create jobs, ready to get our fiscal house in order – ready to do what you sent them to do.

Yes, we’ve still got a long way to go to get to where we need to be.  We didn’t get into this mess overnight, and it’s going to take time to get out of it.  That’s a hard truth – but it’s no excuse for inaction.  After all, America voted for divided government, not dysfunctional government, and we’ve got work to do.  And when we come together and find common ground, there’s no stopping this country.  There’s no stopping our people.  There’s no holding us back.  And there is every reason to believe we’ll get through this storm to a brighter day.

Thanks for listening, and have a nice weekend.

 

---

1. Government subsidized & dictated proof of concept enterprises are not the path to prosperity.  They are the path to failure. The Chevy Volt can not be mass produced at an affordable price. If it could be, the generating capacity needed to operate the fleet does not exist and will not because of onerous regulations blocking the construction of new generating capacity. Lighter, more efficient batteries will not solve the problem. The energy density simply is not available. There is no alternative to hydrocarbon motor fuel. Economic recovery needs to be demand driven, not government driven.
2.  This is a country with little remaining manufacturing industry primarily because of your allies: unions and crony capitalists. The unions priced labor out of the market. Government wanted "economic development", mis-interpreted as "industrialization", for Asia & Latin America. Crony capitalists wanted lower energy costs. Together, they shipped jobs overseas. 
3. No, Mr. President, this is America, not Israel. Get your bearings. 
4. Government's top priority is national security.  We need prosperity to finance security and we need security to maintain prosperity. Employment & wages are not the government's province, they belong in the private economy. Government employs too many and pays too much, contributing to our spiral of economic decline, not curing it. We are deep in debt because of government profligacy, not despite it. 

            Everyone's income is someone else's expense. When wages increase, prices increase... leading to demands for higher wages. Some of us are old  enough  and sober enough to remember what happened under Johnson, Nixon & Carter.  By printing money, you are artificially inflating the cost of everything we need.  By increasing the cost of fuel, you are inflating the price of all commodities, products and services. You're policies are the problem, not  the solution.

5. Strike Washington, insert The White House & Democrat Party. Barry bitches bitterly about his own conduct, attempting to project it onto others who are innocent.
6. Your "politics": your Socialist Agenda & partisanship; those are the problem; what is wrong with our politics. This nation's economic salvation is dependent on the immediate resignations of yourself, the Vice President, the Secretary of State and your Czars.   Go to Hell and good riddance to you!
7. Congress can do nothing positive because AssWholes control the Senate and you wield the veto pen. Your words are perverse because you want the Congress to enact your own counter productive policies which will deepen and prolong the depression.  Congress should reverse every Gd'd thing it did under the second term of Shrub and your first term. That would be a good start, but insufficient to solve the problem.
8.  That "tax cut" helps only those who have jobs, while they have jobs. It also contributes to the insolvency of Social Security and Medicare.  Besides which it is a drop in the bucket while the flood of food and energy inflation spurred by your damn fool policies robs us of purchasing power.
9. Nobody can get a mortgage. Union wages drive up housing costs. Federal regulations drive up housing costs. Artificially low interest rates distort the market. This whole problem stems from the idiotic and self-serving legislation & regulations of Franks, Dodd & co., exploited by their crony capitalist patrons. 
10. Please explain to us how you will engineer one sided trade deals so that our exports will increase but imports won't. How will you get the rest of the world to agree to that?
11. "Incredible" skills? Exactly what part of their legendary skill and courage lacks credibility?  If they are not credible, how can those skills be marketed at home in our domestic economy?  How do we put sniping, defusing IEDs, rifle and artillery fire to work in the domestic economy?  Will we put them to work putting down the riots you and your allies are working hard to foment with your class warfare politics?  Or will Blackwater hire them and go to work putting down the riots in Europe? That would not be "at home", would it?
12. Repeal Obama Dont't Care to reduce costs and increase predictability. Make the "Bush tax cuts" permanent by removing the sunset clause. Cancel the ass-idiot regulations that will double the cost of electricity. Cancel the new regulations on truck fleet fuel economy that will raise the cost of everything and put truckers out of work. Remove the restrictions on domestic oil exploration & production both on and off shore. Do those things immediately and make them permanent!!!
13. Some in Congress: the G'd'd liberals and one in the White house; those are the obstacles to progress. We need to get rid of them and we can't wait until November 6, 2012.
14. You delivered. You promised hope: you delivered despair. You promised change: you delivered ruin.  Politics as usual: promise gold; deliver excrement. The electorate needs to learn from this. Most of them are not smart enough to learn. Everyone who voted for Obama should be removed from the voter rolls  because they are incompetent.
15. Let them know? Yeah, right. Members of Congress: if you voted for the stimulus bills, TARP or Obama Don't Care, resign at once. Do not pass go, do not collect a pension, just go to Hell. The American people are fed up with your conduct in office: misfeasance, malfeasance & non-feasance.  

    Readers, here is your assignment:

• Go to Facebook and ask to join Resign! Resign!! Resign!!!
• Go to http://www.congress.org/  Send an email to Obama, your Senators & Representative. You only need to know your Zip Code, not their names or district numbers. Include the url of this blog post  and Resign! Resign!! Resign!!! [http://www.facebook.com/groups/144597398957614/] in your email.

Obamination: Iftar Treason 2011

Obamination: Iftar Treason 2011 http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/08/10/remarks-president-during-iftar-dinner

    When I heard sound bites from this excrement, I wanted to vomit. When I read an excerpt on Facebook, I prayed for the privilege of standing on the rim of Hell to piss on the burning embers of the traitor who uttered  the despicable maundery quoted below. 

    As is my habit concerning target rich environments, I will mark maggot infestedchunks of excrement with superscripts linked to my comments which follow below the horizontal line. You can use your Backspace key to return from the comments to the excrement. 

THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you.  Thank you so much.  (Applause.)  Everyone, please have a seat, have a seat.

Good evening, everyone, and welcome to the White House.  Tonight is part of a rich tradition here at the White House of celebrating the holy days of many faiths and the diversity that define us as a nation¹.  So these are quintessentially American celebrations² -- people of different faiths coming together³, with humility before our maker, to reaffirm our obligations to one another⁴, because no matter who we are, or how we pray, we’re all children of a loving God⁵.

Now, this year, Ramadan is entirely in August.  That means the days are long, the weather is hot, and you are hungry.  (Laughter.)  So I will be brief.

I want to welcome the members of the diplomatic corps who are here; the members of Congress, including two Muslim American members of Congress⁶ -- Keith Ellison and Andre Carson; and leaders and officials from across my administration.  Thank you all for being here.  Please give them a big round of applause.  (Applause.)   

To the millions of Muslim Americans across the United States and more -- the more than one billion Muslims around the world, Ramadan is a time of reflection and a time of devotion.  It’s an occasion to join with family and friends in celebration of a faith known for its diversity and a commitment to justice and the dignity of all human beings⁷.  So to you and your families, Ramadan Kareem. 

This evening reminds us of both the timeless teachings of a great religion⁸ and the enduring strengths of a great nation.  Like so many faiths, Islam has always been part of our American family⁹, and Muslim Americans have long contributed to the strength and character of our country, in all walks of life.  This has been especially true over the past 10 years¹⁰.

In one month, we will mark the 10th anniversary of those awful attacks that brought so much pain to our hearts.  It will be a time to honor all those that we’ve lost, the families who carry on their legacy, the heroes who rushed to help that day and all who have served to keep us safe during a difficult decade.  And tonight, it’s worth remembering that these Americans were of many faiths and backgrounds, including proud and patriotic Muslim Americans.¹¹

Muslim Americans were innocent passengers on those planes, including a young married couple looking forward to the birth of their first child.  They were workers in the Twin Towers¹² -- Americans by birth and Americans by choice, immigrants who crossed the oceans to give their children a better life.  They were cooks and waiters, but also analysts and executives.  

There, in the towers where they worked, they came together for daily prayers and meals at Iftar.  They were looking to the future -- getting married, sending their kids to college, enjoying a well-deserved retirement.  And they were taken from us much too soon.  And today, they live on in the love of their families and a nation that will never forget.  And tonight, we’re deeply humbled to be joined by some of these 9/11 families¹³, and I would ask them to stand and be recognized, please.  (Applause.)

Muslim Americans were first responders ¹⁴-- the former police cadet who raced to the scene to help and then was lost when the towers collapsed around him; the EMTs who evacuated so many to safety; the nurse who tended to so many victims; the naval officer at the Pentagon who rushed into the flames and pulled the injured to safety.  On this 10th anniversary, we honor these men and women for what they are -- American heroes.

Nor let us forget that every day for these past 10 years Muslim Americans have helped to protect our communities as police and firefighters, including some who join us tonight.  Across our federal government, they keep our homeland secure, they guide our intelligence and counterterrorism efforts and they uphold the civil rights and civil liberties of all Americans¹⁵.  So make no mistake, Muslim Americans help to keep us safe.

We see this in the brave service of our men and women in uniform, including thousands of Muslim Americans.  In a time of war, they volunteered, knowing they could be sent into harm’s way¹⁶.  Our troops come from every corner of our country, with different backgrounds and different beliefs.  But every day they come together and succeed together, as one American team. 

During the 10 hard years of war, our troops have served with excellence and with honor.  Some have made the ultimate sacrifice, among them Army Specialist Kareem Khan.  Galvanized by 9/11 to serve his country, he gave his life in Iraq and now rests with his fellow heroes at Arlington.  And we thank Kareem’s mother, Elsheba, for being here again tonight.  (Applause.)  Like Kareem, this generation has earned its place in history, and I would ask all of our service members here tonight -- members of the 9/11 Generation -- to stand and accept the thanks of our fellow Americans.  (Applause.)        

This year and every year, we must ask ourselves:  How do we honor these patriots -- those who died and those who served?  In this season of remembrance, the answer is the same as it was 10 Septembers ago.  We must be the America they lived for and the America they died for, the America they sacrificed for. ¹⁷

An America that doesn’t simply tolerate people of different backgrounds and beliefs¹⁸, but an America where we are enriched by our diversity.  An America where we treat one another with respect and with dignity, remembering that here in the United States there is no “them” or “us;” it’s just us.  An America where our fundamental freedoms and inalienable rights are not simply preserved, but continually renewed and refreshed -- among them the right of every person to worship as they choose¹⁹.  An America that stands up for dignity and the rights of people around the world, whether a young person demanding his or her freedom in the Middle East or North Africa, or a hungry child in the Horn of Africa, where we are working to save lives.

Put simply, we must be the America that goes forward as one family, like generations before us, pulling together in times of trial, staying true to our core values ²⁰and emerging even stronger.  This is who we are and this is who we must always be. 

Tonight, as we near a solemn anniversary, I cannot imagine a more fitting wish for our nation²¹.  So God bless you all and God bless the United States of America.  Thank you.  (Applause.)     

 

---

1. America is defined by the Declaration of Independence & Constitution, not by faith neither by diversity.  Ramadan is a month long celebration of the revelation of the Qur'an, which commands perpetual warfare against us.  How in Hell can an American celebrate Ramadan?  I curse it; I do not celebrate it.
2. There is nothing American about Ramadan. That month was celebrated by Arabian Pagans long before Moe co-opted it for his new war cult. There is nothing American about celebrating the creation of a war cult which has caused the deaths of 270*10⁶ people in the last 1400 years.
3. No self-respecting Jew, Christian, Buddhist or Hindu with a scintilla of knowledge of the bloody history and doctrines of Islam would join in celebration of the creation of the ultimate evil.
4. When "obligations to each other" is uttered by a Socialist, intelligent listeners and readers immediately recognize the phrase as loaded. It is like a train loaded with "fairness" & "social justice". The President implies that we owe Muslims something. We do: we owe them emancipation from slavery to Satan, failing which we owe them burial plots.  
5. Allah is not a "loving God".  Allah "loves":
   • Truly, Allâh loves those who turn unto Him in repentance and loves those who purify themselves {2:222 about menstruation}
   • Salat {2:210}
   • Those who "fight in his cause" {2:195}
   • whoever fulfils his pledge and fears Allâh much; verily, then Allâh loves those who are Al-Muttaqûn (the pious - see V.2:2).{3:76}
   • Those who spend [in Allâh's Cause - deeds of charity, alms, etc.] in prosperity and in adversity, who repress anger, and who pardon men; verily, Allâh loves Al-Muhsinûn (the good­doers).{3:134}
   • Those who fight in Allah's cause without fleeing the battle. {3:146}
     • And Allâh loves Al-Muhsinûn (the good­doers - see the footnote of V.3:134).{3:148}
   • Those who trust him{3:159}; but see the context: from 156-170: this is really about jihad. Allah loves the fighters.
   • Verily, Allâh loves Al­Muhsinûn {5:13}Who does he hate? See the context : to 5:19
   • the doers of righteous good deeds. {5:93} What are  righteous good deeds? "That is because they suffer neither thirst nor fatigue, nor hunger in the Cause of Allâh, nor they take any step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury upon an enemy but is written to their credit as a deed of righteousness."{9:120}
   • Allâh loves those who make themselves clean and pure{9:108}
   • Surely Allâh loves Al- Mattaqûn (the pious - see V.2:2). {9:4} See the context {9:3-5}
   • Al-Muttaqûn {9:7}In above context. 
   • those who make themselves clean and pure {9:108} But see context through {9:111}.
   • Allâh loves those who are equitable. {49:9}The context is one of internecine fighting. 
   • Allâh loves those who deal with equity. {60:8} See context from{60:4 to 9}
   • Allâh loves those who fight in His Cause in rows (ranks) as if they were a solid structure .{61:4}
6. How many Nazi members of Congress did we have in WWII? 
7. Commitment to justice and dignity?! Islamic law forbids Christians to build or restore churches, display crosses, ring bells, pray aloud and hold public processions. {Reliance of the Traveller, O11.5} Islamic law forbids Christians to testify in court against Muslims. {Reliance O24.2(e)} Islamic law specifies indemnity for the death of a Christian: 1/3 that paid for a Muslim. {Reliance O4.9} Our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims and we have no rights until we become Muslims. {Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387}
8. What in Hell is great about Islam???! World conquest confers greatness?  Since when? Oh, right; terrorism & genocide confer greatness. Religion? Religion! Damnation!!! The religion of Islam is Jihad. Jihad is waging war against disbelievers. 
9. Kindly list & enumerate the Muslims who signed the Declaration of Independence, fought and financed the revolution and helped to write and ratify the Constitution.  That will be a short list.
10. Exactly what have Muslims contributed to this nation because they are Muslims. Please list and enumerate the contributors and their contributions made before and after the Gd'd Abomination. That will be a very short list.  
11. Exactly what do these assertions of Muslim involvement & contribution have to do with celebration of the "revelation" of the most curse worthy "book"? If Muslims were on those four aircraft as passengers & crew rather than attackers, name and enumerate them. Then tell me how that justifies celebration of the "book" that motivated that damnable deed. 
12. How many, and what is the significance of their being Muslims?  How does the presence of 22 Muslims in the towers justify celebrating the damnable doctrines motivating their murders?  
13. Humbled?! Sweet loving Jesus Christ!!! Had I invited survivors of those murdered to a celebration of the damnable doctrines which motivated their murders, I would be so embarrassed I would never show my face in public again, much less make public declaration of it. 
14. Were there more Irish Catholics on those fire trucks and in those police cars, or more Muslims?  Should we celebrate Christmas, Easter & Saint Patrick's day more intensely because of their sacrifice?  Were they members of those protective professions because of their religion or for economic reasons?  
15. Do they? Do they really guard us?  Or do they mis-translate documents, hide vital information, obstruct investigations, pass secrets to the enemy and otherwise subvert us?  Major Nidal Hasan, for example. What a great service he did for his country! 
16. Yeah, right. One fragged officers, one shot up a medical office and one tried to emulate the other's attack. What great things are the others waiting for the right time to do?
17. The America of the Declaration & Constitution, not your Gd'd Socialist agenda. Not the false rhetoric of "social justice", "fairness" & " shared sacrifice"
18. I can neither tolerate nor respect anyone who believes he has a divine mandate to kill or enslave me; to destroy my nation. No, by God, I can not and I will not!  There is no right to conquer. There is no right to enslave. There is no right to rape. There can be no divine mandate to do any of  those things.  Such as assert them are despicable parasites & predators; unworthy of respect and tolerance.  Those who demand respect and tolerance for them are despicable traitors to the human race. 
19. Participation in, propaganda for & financing of jihad are inseverable parts of the primary sacrament of Islam. "Jihad is ordained for you." "...Then do you believe in a part of the Scripture and reject the rest? Then what is the recompense of those who do so among you, except disgrace in the life of this world, and on the Day of Resurrection they shall be consigned to the most grievous torment. ..."{2:85} Islam is all or nothing. Believers are only those who go to war, as defined in 8:1-6, 9:111 & 49:15. 
20. Our core values; Judeo-Christian values enshrined in the Declaration of Independence; not the "values" of conquest, rape and plunder enshrined in the Qur'an & exemplified in hadith; not the Socialist agenda you so glibly imply.
21. I wish we had never elected a traitor to the office of President. I wish he would resign in disgrace and his Vice President and entire administration with him. May God bless America, we really need his help.

Obamination: Resign! Resign!! Resign!!!

  A rapidly growing segment of the American electorate is outraged by the malfeasance of Obamination and misfeasance of those who should have resisted his suicidal policies in Congress. 

    We who are outraged need a means of collective and individual expression that will let us know that we are not alone in our suffering and outrage.  We need a way to testify to our fellow citizens that we are outraged and want the ship of state set aright on a course away from the maelstrom of destruction which is Obamination. 

    We need a way to tell our contemptible demagogues that we recognize what they are and are finished with them; that we disrespectfully demand their resignations, expressing our lack of confidence in and contempt for them. 

Resign! Resign!! Resign!!!  is a new Facebook group that can give us the voice we need. 

• If you are fed up with the lies, racism, class warfare propaganda and malignant malarkey flowing from Obamination, please join this group and add your friends.     
• If you are fed up with rules of engagement that cost precious American lives in Afghanistan, join this group and add your friends. 
• If you are fed up with a President who anal osculates the enemy, join this group and add your friends. 
• If you are fed up with losing your job and being unable to replace it, join this group and add your friends.
• If you are fed up with the high price of fuel & food, join this group and add your friends.
• If you are fed up with losing the equity in your home, join this group and add your friends.
• If you are fed up with the threat of impending forclosure, join this group and add your friends.
• If you are fed up with the escalating erosion of your investments, join this group and add your friends. 

    The group's statement is reproduced below with one minor change. One word has been bowdlerized, it is indicated by bold italic type face.  Most readers will easily guess the real word. 

This group is an open demand directed to President Obama, his appointees & assigns, the timid Republican leadership in the House of Representatives and every Congressman & Senator who voted for or failed to stand firm against Stimulus, Son of Stimulus,  TARP and Obama Don't Care. 

We have no confidence in your ability, skill, will or desire to lead this nation. We have no faith in your fidelity or trustworthiness. We consider you part of the problem, not part of the solution. We disrespectfully demand your immediate resignations.

You are feces. Many of you can and will be flushed in November of next year. Why wait?  Flush yourselves now; limit the stink.

Resign! Resign!! Resign!!!  http://www.facebook.com/groups/144597398957614/

Middle East Situation: Suicidal Stupidity & Timidity

On July 26, 2011, Ambassador Ron Prosor delivered a statement to the Security Council. That statement exemplified the suicidal  timidity & stupidity which will soon cost Israel her existence if not immediately cured by mass regeneration of brains, spines and testicles.

Our Nation seeks a lasting peace in which the Palestinians will have their own state, alongside— but not instead of – the Jewish State of Israel.

Palestinians

Malignant malarkey!!! "Palestine" is an insulting name imposed on Israel after an uprising against foreign occupation.  If they ain't Jews, they ain't Palestinians.    There is no reason for more than one people or more than one state  in the land of Israel.

their own state

They have no interest in statehood; they seek a staging area for the reconquest of Israel. "From the river to the sea"; remember? That slogan has not been abandoned and never will be.  Doubters & dissenters need to read the PLO Charter & HAMAS Charter.

First, let me state clearly: unilateral actions will not bring peace to our region. Like a false idol, the Palestinian initiatives at the United Nations may be superficially attractive to some. Yet, they distract from the true path to peace.

Only eliminating the Muslims from the region will bring peace to it. Muslims or peace. Choose one, you can not have both.

Winston Churchill said that all the secrets of statecraft lie in history. On this question, history’s lessons are unmistakable:  peace can only be achieved through bilateral negotiations that address the concerns of both sides.

The Muslims who occupy Israel do not have concerns, they have demands. How in Hell do you negotiate with someone who demands genocide as the final outcome?  What concession do you make to an existential enemy who is Hellbent on killing you and taking all your possessions?   The HAMAS Charter quotes an infamous genocide hadith which clearly states Islam's intention toward Israel.  The gates of Paradise will not swing open to admit the Muslims until they murder the last Jew; get a clue.

Sahih Muslim Book 041, Number 6985:
Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: The last hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him; but the tree Gharqad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews..  [See also: Sahih Bukhari 4.52.177

They believe that they can't get into the celestial bordello until they kill you off. You believe that you can negotiate peace with them. Only a damned fool can hold that belief.

7:167. And (remember) when your Lord declared that He would certainly keep on sending against them (i.e. the Jews), till the Day of Resurrection, those who would afflict them with a humiliating torment. Verily, your Lord is Quick in Retribution (for the disobedient, wicked) and certainly He is Oft­Forgiving, Most Merciful (for the obedient and those who beg Allâh's Forgiveness).

Who will Allah send to torment the Jews? 

Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2477
Narrated Ibn Hawalah:

    The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: It will turn out that you will be armed troops, one is Syria, one in the Yemen and one in Iraq. Ibn Hawalah said: Choose for me, Apostle of Allah, if I reach that time. He replied: Go to Syria, for it is Allah's chosen land, to which his best servants will be gathered but if you are unwilling, go to your Yemen, and draw water from your tanks, for Allah has on my account taken special charge of Syria and its people.

Our civilians face this reality every single day. No target is free from attack. Just this year, rockets have been launched at homes, synagogues, kindergartens – and even a bright yellow school bus, killing a 16-year old boy.

face reality

    Your civilians face the reality every day; why won't you acknowledge it, declare it and expel the Muslims from your territory, pushing them back beyond rocket range?  You do not get rid of the Islamic occupying force; evidently you do not give a damn about the Jewish people; you don't care about peace.  If you did, you would quit kissing ass and start kicking it.

One does not have to look too far to recognize Israel’s existential security challenges. Let me point out that Israel’s only international airport — named after David Ben-Gurion, one of our founding fathers – lies within a few miles of the West Bank. It is shorter than the distance from where we are sitting right now and JFK or Newark Airports. It could be a target of constant rocket fire. One can only imagine the reaction if other airports were placed under a similar threat.

You recognize the fact that, if you give them the West Bank, Ben-Gurion Airport will be targeted by rockets, yet you propose to give them that land and let them fire away.  Charlie Brown is a cartoon moron who takes a running kick at the ball while knowing that Lucy will snatch it away at the last instant and he will fall, hitting his head on a rock. How can you be as stupid as a cartoon moron? 

Lasting peace must be based on a demilitarized Palestinian state and an emphasis on education that promotes peace instead of hate, tolerance instead of violence, and mutual understanding instead of martyrdom.

If there are Muslims within rocket range, there will never be peace, state or no state. States, by definition are not demilitarized.  If demilitarized in the beginning, that status will not last long. 

    Education that promotes peace... wasn't that in the Oslo Accords? How is that working out for you?  You exemplify the definition of insanity, doing the same thing repeatedly expecting different results.

martyrdom  

Shahids do not go to Hell, they go directly to Allah's bordello, where they get the best places, with the most wine, fruit, meat and whores. Take another look at the HAMAS Charter. What is their highest aspiration?  You will never obtain peace from Muslims until they are dead. If you want to make peace, make dead Muslims; give them the martyrdom the seek and deserve. 

    If Israel wishes to survive, she must rise up as one, overthrow the Netanyahu regime and replace it with someone who will stand up like a man and tell the UN and their Muslim parasites to go to Hell. The vote of no confidence is long overdue. 

Hillary Clinton: Traitor; Collaborating With the Enemy

From IINA comes notice on August 1 that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton plans to host coordination meetings with the OIC on how to implement HRC Resolution 16/18 "on combating defamation of religions, and how to prevent stereotypes depicting religions and their followers; as well as disseminating religious tolerance". 

    This quote from the P.R. is crucial.

According to informed sources in the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, the two sides, in addition to other European parties, will hold a number of specialized meetings of experts in law and religion in order to finalize the legal aspect on how to better implement the UN resolution.

    Does anyone remember how the promotion of the resolution claimed that the "defamation concept" was deprecated in favor of "negative stereotyping" so that freedom of expression is not threatened by the resolution? 

    Methodologies supposedly include education (indoctrination) controverting speech and "inter-religious dialog".  So why involve legal experts?  Whence comes the need or mandate for legislation? 

    How could any such legislation possibly be squared with the First Amendment?   The next paragraph reinforces its predecessor, pay careful attention:

The sources said that the upcoming meetings aim at developing a legal basis for the UN Human Rights Council’s resolution which help in enacting domestic laws for the countries involved in the issue, as well as formulating international laws preventing inciting hatred resulting from the continued defamation of religions.

• enacting domestic laws
• formulating international laws
  • preventing
    • inciting hatred
    •  
      • continued defamation of religions

    How is it possible create a justiciable  definition of "defamation of religions" ?  Why in Hell is anyone seriously considering the matter?   Religions are not subject to proof, they are matters of faith.  Either you believe or you don't. Its your choice, and everyone else has the same choice.  If others have differing opinions of your personal superstition and express them, what harm is done? Is your faith so weak that it can not withstand questioning?  

    Geert Wilders truthfully illustrated the nexus between Islamic doctrine expressed in the Qur'an and exemplified in the hadith with modern examples of rabble rousing, mob violence & terrorism.  His documentary was condemned as "hate speech" and "incitement to violence". He was tried twice and acquitted.  Wilders did not incite mob violence, Imams did at Jumah Salat. The riots happened after Friday prayer services; no coincidence. 

    Had Hitler claimed divine revelation and founded a pseudo religion, Churchill could have been brought up on charges of defamation for criticizing Hitler's cult.   That is exactly what Moe did 1400 years ago.  When poets criticized him in verse, Moe had them murdered.  Such a nice man. How great a role model. In the last decade of his life, Moe started a battle on the average of every six weeks.  How peaceful! 

    Moe married the six year old daughter of his best friend; she was still playing with dolls three years later when he consummated the marriage.  There areseveral muttawir ahadith describing her age, another gives it as seven.   Exposing these facts is condemned as "hate speech".

    Moe commanded the Muslims to wage perpetual war culminating in global conquest; until only Allah is worshiped and Jews & Christians are subjugated and submit to annual extortion. Moe raided one local Jewish settlement, killing all the men and adolescent boys after they surrendered. Exposing these facts is condemned as "inciting violence". 

    No! !!!   Hate speech is telling Allah 17 times per day why he should burn us. "1:6. Guide us to the Straight Way  1:7. The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray (such as the Christians).  "

    Hate speech is cursing us: "2:161. Verily, those who disbelieve, and die while they are disbelievers, it is they on whom is the Curse of Allâh and of the angels and of mankind, combined. " 

    Hate speech is defaming us: "98:6. Verily, those who disbelieve (in the religion of Islâm, the Qur'ân and Prophet Muhammad ()) from among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) and Al-Mushrikûn will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are the worst of creatures.

    Incitement to violence is: "8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do. 

    Incitement to violence is: "9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

    Incitement to violence is threatening eternal damnation for shirking and promising eternity in the celestial whore house for participating in violence: "9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to the earth? Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.
9:39. If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allâh is Able to do all things. "

"61:11.  That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know!  61:12. (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of 'Adn ­ Eternity ['Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success.

    What do you call a cult whose demon demands great slaughter as the price of admission to paradise?  What do you call a cult that promises rewards for any step taken to injure or enrage disbelievers? 

    I have not engaged in hate speech neither have I engaged in incitement to violence.; I have described and documented them.  Not "radicalism"; not "extremism"; that is standard, off the shelf, mainstream Islam, violent by design because Moe got his income from plundering his victims.    Like it or not, that is the fatal fact. If you doubt it, you can find full documentation here: Islam's Mercenary Mission. 

    OIC Secretary General, Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, was quoted thusly:

He added that the reports of the OIC Islamophobia Observatory for the years 2009 and 2010 had included several warnings about an organized political form which the extreme right may transform into through its parties’ legislation.

    They want to make it illegal to organize parties  and campaign on anti-Islamic platforms.   Their apologists are already bitching bitterly about statements made by Gingrich, West, Cain and other candidates.

    Read between the lines, see what they are really doing, wake up, wise up and rise up.  The traitors who do Islam's bidding must be removed from power in the next election cycle.  Those who are weak kneed,. and lack the courage to speak out must be removed with them and replaced by true patriots. Collaborating with the enemy is not acceptable!

Islamic Reformation?

Can Islam Be Reformed?  Dennis Prager asserts that it needs and is capable of reformation.  While stating his belief that Islam is reformable, Prager fails to offer any evidence to support his belief.  Instead, he gives us a five point ordered list of tasks which must be performed. With that great accomplishment, he give us a little information about some supposed reformers. 

    The third point in his task list is a major stumbling block: "Publicly and unambiguously condemn all violence in the name of Islam, including violence against Israel." That presents a problem because any Muslim who does so thereby writes his own death warrant.  Perhaps, as a self-acknowledged student of Arabic and lecturer on comparative religions, Prager should be aware of this provision of Shari'ah, found in Reliance of the Traveller, Book O,. Chapter 8.  First, it prescribes the death penalty for apostasy, next it lists 20 acts entailing apostasy.

O8.1.

When a person who has reached puberty and is sane voluntarily apostatizes from Islam, he deserves to be killed.

O8.2

In such a case, it is obligatory for the caliph (A: or his representive) to ask him to repent and return to Islam. If he does, it is accepted from him, but if he refuses, he is immediately killed.

O8.7: Acts that Entail Leaving Islam[...]

-7- to deny any verse of the Koran or anything which by scholarly consensus (def: b7) belongs to it, or to add a verse that does belong to it;
[...]

    Islamic law forbids rejecting any part of the Qur'an.  For example:

2:216. Jihâd (holy fighting in Allâh's Cause) is ordained for you (Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing which is good for you and that you like a thing which is bad for you. Allâh knows but you do not know.

8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

    Allah ordained jihad for Muslims and commanded them to fight us until resistance ceases, Allah has a global monopoly and Jews & Christians are subjugated and extorted. Prager expects Muslim reformers to abjure those verses; Islamic law demands their heads if they do. 

    There are other insurmountable obstacles to be overcome.  How do you improve on perfection?   Islam can only be defiled, never improved. 

5:3. [...]This day, I have perfected your religion for you, completed My Favour upon you, and have chosen for you Islâm as your religion.[...]

    How do you change that which is compiled into a book, printed & widely published in many languages and strictly forbids  editing? 

6:115. And the Word of your Lord has been fulfilled in truth and in justice. None can change His Words. And He is the All­Hearer, the All­Knower.
10:64. [...]No change can there be in the Words of Allâh, this is indeed the supreme success.[...]

30:30. [...]No change let there be in Khalq­illâh (i.e. the Religion of Allâh Islâmic Monotheism), that is the straight religion, but most of men know not. [...]

    Moe confirmed the fatal fact with a curse.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 9, Book 88, Number 174:

Narrated Sahl bin Sa'd:

I heard the Prophet saying, "I am your predecessor at the Lake-Fount (Kauthar), and whoever will come to it, will drink from it, and whoever will drink from it, will never become thirsty after that. There will come to me some people whom I know and they know me, and then a barrier will be set up between me and them." Abu Sa'id Al-Khudri added that the Prophet further said: "I will say those people are from me. It will be said, 'You do not know what changes and new things they did after you.' Then I will say, 'Far removed (from mercy), far removed (from mercy), those who changed (the religion) after me! "

    In another hadith, Moe cursed the Muslims with disgrace if they abandon warfare as a way of life exchanging it for trade or agriculture. 

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction, hold the tails of oxen, are pleased with agriculture, and give up conducting jihad (struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over you, and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion.

    Only a deluded fool or a liar will claim that Islam can be reformed to render it anodyne. It may go off track for brief periods, but Allah will send someone to return it to his path.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 37, Number 4278:

Narrated AbuHurayrah:

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Allah will raise for this community at the end of every hundred years the one who will renovate its religion for it.