Hedaya 2.140 Annotated

Hedaya 2.141 Annotated

Preserve the First Amendment from Attack by the OIC!

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Major Hasan's act of Worship

In an article at NewsMax cites an FBI estimate saying that 10% of American Mosques teach jihad, Ron Kessler made the following statement.

On the other hand, those who condemn Muslims in general because of the actions of Hasan and others like him are engaging in prejudice that has no place in America. Indeed, such stereotyping sets back the war on terror, because we need moderate Muslims on our side.

The problem is not the Quran, which is no more incendiary than some passages in the Bible. (Deuteronomy, for example, prescribes stoning to death for those who “served other gods and worshipped them.”) The problem is the radical element that uses the Quran as an excuse to engage in terrorism and the failure of many moderate Muslims to condemn the extremists.

It is Islam we condemn in general, not Muslims. Most Muslims are victims of Islam. There are Muslims in name only, who do not practice Islam, but there are no moderate Muslims because there is no moderate Islam. Those who assert otherwise are suffering from extreme cognitive dissonance.

Islam has a standard set by Moe's preaching and practice. Islam is what he said and did in Allah's name. The Qur'an's Surah Al-Anfal contains an imperative to fight disbelievers, specifically the Pagan Meccans, until all resistance ceases and only Allah is worshiped. Hilali & Khan offer this bracketed clarification: "[in the whole of the world ]". Abdullah Yusuf Ali uses a different expression: "faith in God altogether and everywhere".

Surah At-Taubah has an imperative to fight people with scriptural religions until they are subjugated and extorted. Those imperatives are outcome oriented, with neither chronological nor geographic limits.

The Old Testament enjunctions to fight were limited to particular people and places, they were not unlimited. Jesus Christ neither preached nor practiced warfare. Jews and Christians are not engaged in wars of conquest. While Judaism and Christianity have reformed and become passive, Islam is not reformed nor can it. Islam is aggressively attempting to conquer or reconquer on several battlefronts.

The Qur'an is given as Allah's word, transmitted to Moe by Jibril. Allah's religion is perfected for Muslims; perfection can only be defiled, not improved. Allah's word can not be changed. When Allah abrogated a verse, he replaced it with something better; Surah At-Taubah was revealed next to last, it abrogates earlier, more tolerant and passive verses. Since Moe was Allah's final and greatest 'Prophet', Allah has no messenger, his word is immutable, fixated in the 7th century.

Moe testified that he was "
ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.'", confirming the imperatives cited above. Muhammad fought in 19 battles. Muslims assert that those battles were defensive, not offensive but only two of them were. Moe dictated and dispatched extortion letters, which he followed up with his army if the recipients did not comply with his demands. His letter to the Chiefs of Aqaba is the most explicit, it leaves no doubt about his intentions.

Allah described his relationship with Muslims as that of master: slave, the slave's mission being to fight in his cause, killing and being killed. Jihad is mandatory, "ordained" for Muslims. The penalty for refusing to fight is "painful torment", a hint of Hellfire. The "commerce that will save you from a painful torment" is "that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and your lives". According to Allah, any step the believers take to anger or injure disbelievers will be "written to their credit as a deed of righteousness.".

Islam's canon of jurisprudence is the ultimate confirmation. Reliance of the Traveller, is the handbook of fiqh. Its Book O is the book of Justice. Its ninth chapter lays down the law of Jihad, defining it, describing its obligatory nature and explaining the obligation: "Jihad is a communal obligation, meaning upon the Muslims each year. ". Al-Shafi'i clarified the issue with this ruling.
"The least that the imam must do is that he allow no year to pass without having organised a military expedition by himself, or by his raiding parties, according to the Muslims' interest, so that the jihad will only be stopped in a year for a (reasonable) excuse."
I will quote the first sentence from each of the two sections which confirm the obvious.

O9.8: The Objectives of Jihad

The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,

"Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled" (Koran 9:29).


The caliph fights all other peoples until they become Muslim (O: because they are not a people with a Book, nor honored as such, and are not permitted to settle with paying the poll tax (jizya) ) .
Islamic law clearly confirms Allah's Jihad imperatives and Moe's testimony that he was ordered to fight. The caliph has a duty to make war on Kuffar in every year, if possible, until the entire world is conquered. Of course, the caliph's order or permission is required to mount an attack, unless there is no caliph. (O9.6).

Contrary to Mr. Kessler's assertion, condemnation of Islam is not prejudicial and the Qur'an is the root of the problem. Muslims whose personal morality conflicts with orthodox Islamic doctrine should remove Allah's yoke of slavery from their necks and become freemen. If you do not want to kill Kuffar, rape their widows and enslave their orphans, why are you Allah's slave? Emancipate yourself and rejoin humanity.

In remarks uttered at a memorial service for the servicemen slain at Fort Hood, President Obama said this.
It may be hard to comprehend the twisted logic that led to this tragedy. But this much we do know -- no faith justifies these murderous and craven acts; no just and loving God looks upon them with favor. For what he has done, we know that the killer will be met with justice -- in this world, and the next.
A Muslim is not permitted to fight and kill another Muslim except in the authorized enforcement of Islamic law. Major Hasan was reluctant to go into battle against his brethren, but not to go into battle against his comrades. Muslims chant Allah-hu Akbar when slaughtering sacrificial animals and attacking Kuffar. Major Hasan shouted takbir because he was engaging upon the slaughter of his enemies, transferring his fear from himself to them and praising Allah

Murder can not be justified, it is unjust, but Islam rationalizes it. We learn from Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387 that the blood of Kuffar is not sacred to Muslims. Kuffar are considered rebels against Allah, and therefore not innocent. They are fair prey, targets of opportunity. . Islam divides the world into Dar ul-Islam where Allah's writ runs, and Dar ul-Harb, where Kuffar rule. Dar al-Harb is the land of war. It must be attacked until the entire world is Dar al-Islam.

Allah is sovereign over the world, its divine ruler because, as its creator, he owns it all. Where men are governed by man made law, they are in rebellion against Allah, depriving him of his divine right to rule. Allah has commanded Muslims to overthrow the rebels and extend Allah's rule over the entire world. Allah has promised them success in that mission. You can verify these facts by reading 13:41, 14:15, 40:51 and 61:9.
We're a nation that guarantees the freedom to worship as one chooses.
Major Hasan chose to worship Allah by sacrificing 13 Kuffar soldiers. That is his right because Jihad is a mandatory sacrament, being ordained by Allah. Allah said "Slay them wherever you find them'". Is that cherry picking? Is that out of context? If it is, tell it to the Shafi'ite jurists who wrote Reliance of the Traveller; that quote is part of the scriptural basis of jihad given in O9.0.


al Rassooli said...

Part 1 of 2:

This is an excellent article, although I had to read quite a lot of it before being sure it would properly refute the totally incorrect (but probably well intentioned) comments made by Ron Kessler that it quoted at the start.

Those of you familiar with my YouTube talks will know that for technical reasons I don’t like the general term “Muslim” but prefer to call followers of Muhammad, and all 1.5 billion or so adherents to his cult, “Muhammadan Muslims”. All of these Muhammadan Muslims ARE required to fight, besiege, beleaguer and if possible murder anyone who happens not to share their exact beliefs. This is very clearly set out in unequivocal terms in many places and different ways in the Quran.

As this article correctly points out there are no such regulations or instructions for Christians or Jews (whom the Muhammadan Muslims rudely and derogatorily call “the people of the book” since, in an effort to help focus their hate, that is what their book tells them to call these people).

It’s normal for Muhammadan Muslims to purposely distort and pervert the meanings of even commonly used and understood words in order to try and confuse and trick their perceived adversaries, i.e. everyone in the entire world. Often further confusion arises because these same Muhammadan Muslims have been trained to see the world (and everyone in it) in such a bizarrely different way from the rest (majority) of us. Realising all this helps us better understand what probably motivated Major Hasan’s recent killing and maiming spree and what might have been going through his mind at the time.

(IQ al Rassooli) ...continued...

al Rassooli said...

Part 2 of 2:

There can be little doubt he was acting out his fantasy “master-slave” relationship in killing, and presumably hoping to be killed (as a “martyr”) for “Allah”, exactly as this article so clearly and well explains. It’s worth adding that for Muhamadan Muslims, as I’ve explained elsewhere (for example "Mission Europe/Worldpress") there’s a perhaps unexpected twist in their understanding of the word “innocent”, as in whether or not Major Hasan’s many victims were “innocent” people. Many people (Muhammadans, of course, and all those misinformed and deluded folk who apologise for them) often claim that “the Quran forbids the killing of innocent people”. Rather surprisingly there is an element of truth in this PROVIDED you know that Muhammad condemned as a “criminal” who justifiably deserved death everyone who neither believed in him utterly, nor willingly submitted in every way to all the absurdities and deceits of Islam! Therefore unless you happen to submit to Islam you cannot (by their definition) be “innocent” and so people like Maj. Hasan not only feel free to murder you, along with any and all other “Kuffar”, if and when they can get away with it (or simply when they feel like it), but worse still they feel totally justified in doing so because their “divine” and (also in their opinion only) “perfect” horror-story of a book (the infamous Quran) has made it clear that it’s their “duty” to do so.

Bearing this in mind you’ll see why followers of Muhammad (who of course include almost all of the world terrorists) can happily say they don’t believe in intentionally killing “innocent people” because from their point of view they don’t. When they randomly murder people who do not submit to Islam they consider they are doing good as none of these “Kuffar” are innocent in the warped minds of Muhammad’s advocates. When in the process they accidentally kill a few of their fellow believers (or themselves) that’s no problem either as they consider it jolly lucky and a huge blessing to die either directly or indirectly from their own or someone else’s acts of Jihad – in fact its what they all desire most as they believe its a sure way to go straight to their “brothel in the sky” where they can immediately start molesting a few of their 72 mindless virgins!

There’s plenty more that could be said but I hope that was a useful introduction for those of you who didn’t realize just how bizarrely Islam re-wires these people’s brains?

Kind Regards,
IQ al Rassooli
my website: www.al-Rassooli.org
Our (including YOUR) website: www.U-al-K.org

Ben said...

Thank you, IQ al Rassooli, for visiting and commenting.

Unfortunately, this blog does not receive very much traffic.

These articles are cross posted in about 9 places, which you can find by Googling the title, in quotes. Grizzly Groundswell and Bloggersbase probably have the most viewers.

Grizzly Groundswell is a Conservative network using Facebook & Twitter to maximum advantage.