Which brings me to my next point: As we protect our country from terrorism, we should not reinforce the ideas and the rhetoric of the terrorists themselves. I often hear it said that we need moral clarity in this fight. And the suggestion is somehow that if I would simply say, these are all Islamic terrorists, then we would actually have solved the problem by now, apparently. (Laughter.) Well, I agree, we actually do need moral clarity. Let’s have some moral clarity. (Applause.)
Groups like ISIL are desperate for legitimacy. They try to portray themselves as religious leaders and holy warriors who speak for Islam. I refuse to give them legitimacy. We must never give them that legitimacy. (Applause.) They’re not defending Islam. They’re not defending Muslims. The vast majority of the people they kill are innocent Muslim men, women and children. (Applause.)
reinforce terrorist rhetoric
LibTards deny the fatal facts of Islam because they falsely equate eradicating predators to the Shoa. They can not bear the truth: Islam is an all encompassing way of life which preys upon the human race.LibTards can not acknowledge the Islamic character of the Islamic State because that would destroy their "religion of peace" house of cards.
Recognizing ISIS as Islamic does not legitimize or rationalize ISIS, it just recognizes it as part of Ummah al-Islamiyya.
Outside of using modern weapons and technology, ISIS is not doing much Moe and his companions did not do. They can cherry pick hadith to justify their works.
moral clarity
Islam's position is: Allah, as creator, owns the earth and all that is on it. He gives it to whom he wills. He gave it to Moe. Muslims have a divine mandate to seize it by force and impose Allah's rules on the whole human race. Allah will surely make Muslims successors in the earth, he gives it to them by conquests. How moral is that?Moe said: "I am raised for Jihad and I am not raised for tillage". He said that when Muslims hold the tails of oxen and abandon Jihad, Allah will curse them with disgrace until they return to their "original religion. Moe said that his provision was placed under the shade of his spear. How moral is that?
Moe, speaking for Allah, said "fight them until" only Allah is worshiped and Christians are subjugated and extorted. He raped captive women and allowed his companions to seize and rape women. Moral is that?
Captured women and children are enslaved by default. How moral is that? Infidels may be attacked without provocation. How moral is that?
Moe, speaking for Allah, said: "I will cast terror", "Allah cast terror", "You [and your army] are more a terror in the Jew's hearts than Allah." and "I have been made victorious with terror..." How moral is that?
Its Islam, Stupid!
ISIS, HAMAS and the rest of the alphabet soup of Islamic terrorism are believing Muslims, obeying Allah and emulating Moe, nothing more. They add nothing to and subtract nothing from Islam.radical
"Radical Islam" is an accursed lie "Extremists" is an accursed lie. Its Islam, Stupid! It is what Allah commanded and Moe did. Its Sunnah. Its Shari'ah. There is no "moderate Islam". There is no anodyne, benevolent Islam. The "golden age" of Islam was conquest and empire.Identification is no solution
Obamination uses a straw man argument, redolent of the feces gluing the straw together. While identifying the enemy is essentially necessary to victory, it is far from sufficient. We do not win by identifying Islam as the enemy, we win by freeing the earth from its infestation.We can not take the first steps on the road to victory without identifying the enemy and recognizing the existential necessity of its extermination.
legitimacy
Its Islamic law: Shari'ah, Stupid. "Allah said.", Moe said., Moe did. It is based on the Qur'an, hadith and sira. Get your head out of your anus, wipe the drek from your eyes and get a Godblessed clue for Chrissake!!!3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67,
9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123,
33:26,27,
47:4,49:15,
59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.
The above listed ayat and ahadith are essentially necessary to understanding Islamic terrorism. Click each one and read it carefully. What part of "I will cast terror" do you not comprehend? What part of "Allah cast terror" do you not understand? What part of rewarding acts of terrorism as righteous good deeds do you not comprehend?
Re-read those ayat and ahadith until reality sinks in and you get a clue.
One Arab spoke for Allah and his word is final; I gave you links to it above. ISIS is acting for Allah: fighting in his cause just as Moe did in the seventh century.
defending Islam
Islam has enemies: everyone who is not a Muslim is an enemy; waging war against Allah. Read 5.33, then consider this quote from Tafsir Ibn Kathir: `Wage war'
mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes
disbelief,
blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways.
To us, Islamic imperialism is offensive warfare, from their point of view, its defending Islam.
No comments:
Post a Comment