Second Presidential Debait Bones To Pick
I call it a
Debait 'cuz it was a parallel press
conference, not a forensic
debate.
It was really a Trump baiting session, but Trump stood up and fought
back in excellent form for the most part. I have bones to pick
with both sides.
In the interest of time I selected a few important
issues to dispute, highlighted them in
the transcript
and will pick them out of sequence with just enough context to convey
the full meaning of the quotes. Superscripts in the quotes are linked
to my commentary which follows.
And he never apologized
for the racist1
lie that President
Obama was not born in the United States of America.2
He owes the
president an apology and he owes our country an apology and he needs to
take responsibility for his actions and his words.
Raddatz: We go to Gorbah Hameed for a question for both candidates.
Hamed: Hi. There are 3.3 million
Muslims in the United
States and I'm one of them. You’ve mentioned working with Muslim
nations. But with
Islamophobia3
on
the rise, how will you help people like me deal with the consequences4
of being labelled as a threat to the country after the election is over?
Raddatz: Mr. Trump, you’re first.
Trump: You are right about Islamophobia
and that's a shame.5 But one thing we have to do is,
we have to make
sure that, because there is a problem. I mean, whether we like it or
not and we can be politically correct6, but whether we like it or not,
there is a problem. And we
have to be sure that Muslims come in and
report when they see
something7 going on. When they see hatred
8 going on,
they have to report it9. As the example in San
Bernardino. Many people
saw the bombs all over the apartment of the two people that killed 14
and wounded many, many people. Horribly wounded, they will never be the
same. Muslims have to report the problems when they see them. And, you
know, there is always a reason for everything. If they don't do that,
it's a very difficult situation for our country. Because you look at
Orlando and you look at San Bernardino and you look at the World Trade
Center. Go outside and you look at Paris, look at that horrible thing. These
are radical10
Islamic
terrorists and she won't even mention the word and nor will President
Obama. He won't use the term radical Islamic terrorist, no. To solve a
problem you have to be able to state what the problem is or at least,
say the name. She won't say the name and President Obama won't say the
name. But the name is there. It's
radical Islamic terror11. And before you solve it, you
have to say the name.
Raddatz:
Secretary Clinton.
Clinton: Thank you for asking your question and I’ve heard this
question from a lot of Muslim Americans across our country. Because
unfortunately there has been a lot of very divise, dark things said
about Muslims12. And even someone like Captain
Khan, the young man who
sacrificed himself defending our country in the United States Army has
been subject to attack by Donald13. I want to say just a couple
of
things. First: We’ve had Muslims in America since George Washington.
And we’ve had many successful Muslims. We just lost a particularly
well-known one with Muhammad Ali. My vision of America is an America
where everyone has a place, if you are willing to work hard, do your
part and you contribute to the community. That's what America is.
That's what we want America to be for our children and our
grandchildren. It's also very short-sighted and even dangerous to be
engaging in the kind of demagogic rhetoric that Donald has about
Muslims14.
We need American Muslims to be part of our eyes and ears on
our front lawns15.
I’ve worked with a lot of Muslim groups around
America. I’ve met with a lot of them and I’ve heard how important it is
for them to feel that they are wanted and included and part of our
country. Part of our homeland security. And that's what I want to see.
It's also important, I intend to defeat ISIS16,to do so in a coalition
with majority Muslim nations. Right now, a lot of those nations are
hearing what Donald says and wondering why should we cooperate17
with the
Americans and this is a gift to ISIS and the terrorists. Violent
jihadist terrorists. We
are not at war with Islam18 and
it is a mistake, and it plays into the hands of the terrorists, to act
as though we are. So I want a country where citizens like you and your
family are just as welcome as anyone else.
Raddatz: Thank you, secretary Clinton. Mr. Trump, in December you said
this: ‘Donald J. Trump is calling if are a total and complete shut down
of Muslims entering the United States until our country's
representatives can figure out what the hell is going on. We have no
choice. We have no choice.’ Your running mate said the Muslim ban is no
longer your position. Is that correct and if it is, was it a mistake to
have a religious test
19?
Trump: First of all,
Captain Khan is
an American hero and if I were president at that time he would be alive
today because, unlike her who voted for the war without knowing what
she was doing, I would not have had our people in Iraq. Iraq was a
disaster. So he would have been alive today. The Muslim ban is
something that in some form has morphed into an extreme vetting from
certain areas of the world. Hillary Clinton wants to allow --
Raddatz: Why did it morph into that. No answer the question. Would you
please explain whether or not the Muslim ban still stands?
Trump: It is called extreme vetting. We are going to areas like Syria
where they are coming in by the tens of thousands because of Barack
Obama and Hillary Clinton wants wants to allow a 550% increase over
Obama. People are coming into our country like we have no idea who they
are, where they are from, what their feelings about our country is and
she wants 550% more. This is going to be the great Trojan horse of all
time. We have enough problems in this country. I believe in building
safe zone
20,
I believe in having other people pay for them, as an example
the [Arabian] Gulf states who are not carrying their weight but they
have nothing but money and take care of people. But I don't want to
have, with all the problems this country has and all of the problems
you see going on, hundreds of thousands of people come in from Syria
where we know nothing about them. We know nothing about their values
and we know nothing about their love for our country
21.
Raddatz: Secretary Clinton, let me ask you about that. You have asked
for an increase from 10 to 65,000 Syrian refugees. We know you want
tougher vetting. That's not a perfect system. So why take the risk of
having those refugees come into the country?
Clinton: First of all, I will not let anyone into our country that I
think poses a risk to us
22. But there are a lot of
refugees, women and
children, think of that picture we all saw of that 4-year-old boy with
the blood on his forehead because he’d been bombed by the Russian and
Syrian air forces. There are children suffering in this catastrophic
war, largely, I believe because of Russian aggression
23.
And we need to
do our part. We, by no means, are carrying anywhere near the load that
Europe and others are. But we will have vetting that is as tough as it
needs to be from our professionals, our intelligence experts and
others. But it is important for us as a policy not to say, as Donald
has said, we’re going to ban people based on a religion. How do you
that
24?
We are a country founded on religious freedom and liberty. How do
we do what he has advocated without causing great distress within our
own country
25? Are we going to have
religious tests when people fly into
our country and how do we expect to be able to implement those?
26
So I
thought that what he said was extremely unwise and even dangerous and
indeed you can look at the propaganda on a lot of the terrorist sites
and what Donald Trump says about Muslims is used to recruit fighters.
Because they want to create a war between us. And the final thing I
say, this is the 10th or 12th time he denied being for the war in Iraq.
We have it on tape, the entire press corps has looked at it, it’s been
debunked but it never stops him from saying whatever he wants to say.
Go to Hillaryclinton.com.
Raddatz: Thank you Mr. Trump. I want to move on. This next question
comes from the public through the bipartisan open debate coalition’s
online forum where Americans submitted questions that generated
millions of votes. This question involves WikiLeaks’ release of
purported excerpts of Secretary Clinton’s paid speeches speeches, which
she has refused to release. In one line in particular, in which you
Secretary Clinton purportedly say, ‘You
need both a public and private
position on certain issues.’ So, two from Virginia asks: ‘is
it okay
for politicians to be two-faced? Is it acceptable for a politician to
have have a private stance on issues?’ Secretary Clinton? Two minutes.
Clinton: Right. As I recall, that was something I said about Abraham
Lincoln27
after having seen the wonderful Steven Spielberg movie called
Lincoln. It was a master class watching president Lincoln get the
congress to approve the 13th amendment. It was principled and it was
strategic and I was making the point that it is hard, sometimes, to get
the congress to do what you want to do. And you have to keep working at
it and yes, president Lincoln was trying to convince some people, he
used some arguments, convincing other people, he used other arguments.
That was a great, I thought, a great display of presidential
leadership. But, you know, let's talk about what's really going on
here, Martha because our intelligence community just came out and said
in the last few days that the Kremlin, meaning Putin and the Russian
government, are directing the attacks, the hacking on American accounts
to influence our election. And WikiLeaks is part of that as are other
sites where the Russians hack information, we don't even know if it's
accurate information and then they put it out. We have never in the
history of our country been in a situation where an adversary, a
foreign power, is working so hard to influence the outcome of the
election28,
and believe, they’re not doing it to get me elected. They are
doing it to try to influence the election for Donald Trump. Now, maybe
because he praised Putin, maybe because he says he agrees with a lot of
what Putin wants to do, maybe because he wants to do business in
Moscow. I don’t know the reasons, but we deserve answers, and should
demand that Donald release all of his tax returns so that people can
see what are the entanglements and the financial relationships--
Raddatz: We’re going to move
on to Syria. Both of you have mentioned that.
Trump: But she said a lot of
things that were false. I think we should --29
Raddatz: Mr. Trump, we will
go on. Mr. Trump, we are going to move on.
The heart breaking video of a 5-year-old Syrian boy named Omran sitting
in an ambulance after being pulled from the rubble after an airstrike
in Aleppo focused the world's attention on the horrors of the war in
Syria, with 136 million views on Facebook alone. But there are much
worse images coming out of Aleppo every day now where in the past few
weeks alone 400 have been killed, at least 100 of them children. Just
days ago, the State Department called for a war crimes investigation of
the Syrian regime of Bashar al-Assad and of its ally, Russia, for their
bombardment of Aleppo. So this next question comes from social media,
through Facebook. Diane from Pennsylvania asks If you were president, what
would you do about Syria and the humanitarian crisis in Aleppo? Isn’t
is a lot like wasn't it like the Holocaust when the U.S. waited too
long before we helped?
Secretary Clinton, we will begin with your two minutes.30
Clinton: The situation in
Syria is catastrophic and everyday that goes
by, we see the results of the regime, by Assad in partnership with the
Iranians on the ground and the Russians in the air, bombarding places
in particular aleppo, where there are hundreds of thousands of people,
probably about 250,000 people still left. And there is a determined
effort by the Russian
Air Force to destroy Aleppo in order to eliminate the last of the
Syrian rebels who are really holding out against the Assad regime.
Russia hasn't paid any attention to ISIS. They are interested in
keeping Assad in power.31 So I, when I was secretary of
state advocated,
and I advocate today a no-fly32 and safe zones33. We
need some leverage
with the Russians because they are not going to come to the negotiating
table for a diplomatic resolution unless there is leverage over them.
And we have to work more closely with our partners and allies on the
ground. But I want to emphasize that what is at stake here is the
ambitions and aggressiveness of Russia. Russia has decided it is all in
in Syria, and they’ve also decided who they want to see become
President of the United States too and it's not me. I stood up to
Russia; I’ve taken on Putin and others and I would do that as
president. I think wherever we can cooperate with Russia, that's fine
and I did, as Secretary of State, that's how we got a treaty reducing
nuclear weapons, it’s how we got the sanctions on Iran that put a lid
on the nuclear weapons program without firing a single shot. So I would
go with more leverage than we have now. But I support the efforts to
investigate for crimes, war crimes, committed by the Syrians and the
Russians and try to hold them accountable.
Raddatz: Thank you Secretary
Clinton. Mr. Trump.
Trump: First of all, she was
there as Secretary of State with the so-called line in the sand.
Clinton: No I wasn't, I was
gone. I hate to interrupt you. At some point we need to get the facts
out.
Trump: You were still in
contact with the White House. And perhaps
sadly, Obama probably still listened to you. I don't think he would
listen to you very much anymore. Obama draws the line in the sand. It
was laughed at all over the world what happened. Now, with that being
said, she talks tough against Russia, but our nuclear program has
fallen way behind and they have gone wild with their nuclear program.
Not good. Our government shouldn’t have allowed that to happen. Russia
is new in terms of nuclear and we are old and tired and exhausted in
terms of nuclear. A very bad thing.
Now, she talks tough. She
talks really tough against Putin and against
Assad. She talks in favor of the rebels. She doesn't even know who the
rebels are34.
You know, every time we take rebels whether it's in Iraq or
anywhere else, we’re arming people. And you know what happens? They end
up being worse than the people. Look at what she did in Libya with
Qaddafi. Qaddafi is out. It's a mess. And by the way, ISIS has a good
chunk of their oil. I'm sure you’ve probably have heard that. It was a
disaster. The fact is almost everything she has done has been a mistake
and it’s been a disaster. But if you look at Russia, just take a look
at Russia and look at what they did this week, and I agree she wasn't
there, but possibly she’s consulted.
We sign a peace treaty and
everyone’s all excited, but what Russia did
with Assad and by the way with Iran who you made very powerful with the
dumbest deal perhaps I have seen in the history of making, with the
$150 billion and with the $1.7 billion in cash, which is enough cash to
fill up this room, but look at that deal. Iran and Russia are against
us. So she wants to fight. She wants to fight for rebels. There’s one
problem. You don’t even know who the rebels are. So what’s the purpose?35
Raddatz: Mr. Trump, your two
minutes is up.
Trump: I don't like Assad at
all, but Assad is killing ISIS. Russia is
killing ISIS and Iran is killing ISIS and they have lined up because of
weak foreign policy.
Raddatz: Mr. Trump, let me
repeat the question. If you were president, what
would you do about Syria36 and
the humanitarian crisis in Aleppo, and I want to remind you what your
running mate said. He said provocations by Russia need to be met with
American strength and that if Russia continues to be involved in
airstrikes along with the Syrian government forces of Assad, the United
States of America
should be prepared to use military force to strike the military targets
of the Assad regime.
Trump: Okay. He and I haven't
spoken, and I disagree.
Raddatz: You disagree with
your running mate?
Trump: I disagree. Right now,
Syria is fighting ISIS. We have people
that want to fight both at the same time. But Syria is no longer Syria.
Syria is Russia and it’s Iran who she made strong and Kerry and Obama
made into a powerful nation and a rich nation, very quickly, very, very
quickly. I believe we have to get ISIS. We have to worry about ISIS
before we can get too much more involved. She had a chance to do
something with Syria, they had a chance, and that was the line.
Raddatz: What are do you
think will happen if Aleppo falls?
Trump: Aleppo is a disaster,
humanitarian wise.
Raddatz: What will happen if
it falls?
Trump: I think that it
basically has fallen, okay? It basically has
fallen. Let me tell you something: you take a look at Mosul. The
biggest problem I have with the stupidity of our foreign policy. We
have Mosul, they think a lot of the ISIS leaders are in Mosul. So we
have announcements out of Washington and coming out Iraq. We will be
attacking Mosul in three weeks or four weeks. So all of these bad
leaders from ISIS are leaving Mosul. Why can't they do it quietly? We
can’t they do the attack and make it a sneak attack and after the
attack is made inform the American public that we have knocked out the
leaders; we’ve have a tremendous success. People leave. Why do they
have to say we are going to be attacking Mosul within the next four to
six weeks, which is what they’re saying. How stupid is our country?37
Raddatz: There are sometimes
reasons the military does that. Psychological warfare.
Trump: I can't think of any.
Raddatz: It might be to get
civilians out.
Trump: I can't think of any.
I have 200 generals and admirals who
endorsed me. I have 21 congressional Medal of Honor recipients who
endorse me. We talk about it all the time. They understand. Why can't
they do something secretively where they go in and knock out the
leadership. Why would these people stay there? I’ve been reading there
for weeks about Mosul...
Raddatz: Tell me what your
strategy is it.
Trump: That it’s the harbor
between Raqqa and Mosul, this is why where
they think the ISIS leaders are. Why would they be staying...they are
not staying there anymore. They are gone. Because everybody is talking
about how Iraq which is us with our leadership goes into fight Mosul.
With the 200 admirals and generals, they can't believe it. General
George Patton and General Douglas MacArthur are spinning in their grave
at the stupidity of what we are doing in the Middle East.
Raddatz: I’m going to go to
Secretary Clinton, you want Assad to go,
you advocated arming rebels, but it looks like that may be too late for
Aleppo. You talk about diplomatic efforts, those that failed,
ceasefires have failed. Would you introduce the threat of U.S. military
force beyond a no-fly zone against the Assad regime to back up
diplomacy?
Clinton: I would not use
American ground forces in Syria. I think that
would be a very serious mistake. I don't think American troops should
be holding territory38 which is what they would have
to do as an
occupying force. I don't think that is a smart strategy. I do think the
use of special forces, which we’re using, the use of enablers and
trainers in Iraq, which has had positive effects, are very much in our
interests. So I do support what is happening.
Raddatz: What would you do
different than than President Obama is doing?
Trump: Everything.
Clinton: Martha, I hope that
by the time I am president that we will
have pushed ISIS out of Iraq. I do think that there is a good chance
that we can take Mosul. And you know, Donald said he knows more about
ISIS than the generals. No, he doesn't. There are a lot of very
important planning going on and some of it is to signal to the Sunnis
in the are,a as well as Kurdish Peshmerga fighters that we all need to
be in this. And that takes a lot of planning and preparation. I would
go after Baghdadi . I would specifically target Baghdadi. Because I
think our targeting of Al Qaeda leaders, and I was involved in a lot of
those operations, highly classified ones, made a difference. I think
that could help. I would consider arming the Kurds. The kurds have been
our best partners in Syria, as well as Iraq. And I know there’s a lot
of concern about that in some circles, but they should have the
equipment they need so that Kurdish and Arab fighters on the ground are
the principal way we take Raqqa after pushing ISIS out of Iraq.
Trump: You know that’s funny.
She went over a minute over and you don't stop her. When I go one
second over --
Raddatz: You had many answers.
Trump: It's very interesting
racist
Barack Hussein Obama may be a Mulatto, but his race
is irrelevant. Criticizing and questioning his eligibility and
his policies are personal, not racial. Shouting "racist" is
a favorite
Lib
Turd tactic for shutting down
debate; it must be rejected.
No apology is due from Trump, as he explained, any apology is due from
Clinton, whose campaign created the "birther" movement.
Not Born In America?
According to his publisher,
he was born in Kenya.
Snopes has published the image of the blurb so that you can see it and
evaluate it for yourself. Where did that birth place claim originate if
not with Obama? If it is untrue, why would he allow it to be
published? The image that follows was clipped from
this pdf file
on the White House Web site. It is presented as the President's
"long form" "Certificate of Live birth". If it is authentic, why does
it not include the
embossed
seal of the Health Department which is found on genuine birth
certificates issued by Hawaii? I resampled this 100% and
sharpened it with Irfanview. I experimented with color corrections, but
the embossed seal simply is not present.
This is the purported
short form first released by the White House. Note
that there is no
embossed seal
on it. This image has been resampled and sharpened.
Islamophobia
Phobia denotes an irrational fear. After the attacks
in Paris, Brussels, San Bernardino, Orlando, New York and New Jersey,
fear of Islam and Muslims is common sense, not irrational but well
founded."Islamophobia" is one of the buzzwords lused by disciples of
Saul Alinsky to shut down debate.
Consequences
Islamic identification should bear consequences:
distrust, aversion, expulsion and exclusion. Without exception, all of
the perpetrators of Islamic terror attacks are Muslims. Can you get a
clue? "
I will cast terror", "
Allah cast terror", "
to strike terror", "
to terrify thereby", "
You are more of a terror" and "
I have been made victorious with terror": what the
Hell part of that do you not comprehend? And
Allah awards Brownie Points for steps taken to injure
or enrage us.
Every Muslim is obligated to engage in terrorism.
The
believers
will eventually do it. Get your head out of the sand and demand that
the government impose consequences on potential Muslim terrorists.
No Muslims: no terrorism.
right about Islamophobia
With all due disrespect to Mr. Trump, that is a
prime example of disgusting Islamopandering, unworthy of a candidate
for President. The questioner was wrong in propounding the
question and Trump was wrong to take the bait.
we can be politically
correct
And you are in that answer! Abandonment of PC is
long overdue!
Muslims report
Only an ignorant fool, which Trump is, expects
Muslims to fink on terrorists! Finking on a brother constitutes
apostasy, which bears the death penalty. Debi Brand did the research
and explained the details
here: read it and get a clue.
Hatred
Allah hates sinners. Muslims are obligated to hate
what Allah hates. Its Wala wal Bara: 'Love and hate for the Sake of
Allah". Read the disgusting details
here and curse Islam.
radical
Radical means to the root. The root of Islamic
terrorism is the Qur'an. Click through and get a clue:
3:151,
8:12,
39,57,
60,
65,
67,
9:5,
29,
38,
39,
111,
120,
123,
33:26,
27,
47:4,
49:15,
59:2,
13,
61:10-13;
Sahih Bukhari
1.7.331 &
4.52.220.
There is no radical or extreme Islam. There is no
moderate or anodyne Islam. It's Islam, Stupid!!! Abandon PC: quit
prefixing adjectives to Islam & Muslims.
It's Islam, Stupid!
It is not radical. It is not extreme. It is not a
product of distortion, perversion or hijacking: the deity of Islam
commands it. The Profit of Islam exemplified it. Get the your head out
of your arse and read the
damnable details!!! Get a clue!
said about Muslims
Trump said "we have a
Muslim problem", "
they hate us" and
called for a
ban on
admission of Muslims. He called for
surveillance of Muslim neighborhoods and mosques.
Dr. Carson said that
we should not elect a Muslim President.
Those statements are common sense: light, not darkness and dividing the
predators from their prey is common sense.
Muslim problem
In the last year, 63 people were killed by Muslims in mass
murder attacks and 96 were injured. No problem, Hillary?
they hate us
'Cuz we ain't Muslims. We "
went astray"; we are "
the worst of living creatures".
Allah, the Angels and men curse us; which men
would that be?
Muslims?!
Ban Mualims
If Muslims were banned in a timely manner, Bobby
Kennedy might have died of natural causes, The 14 killed at Fort Hood,
the three killed at the Boston Marathon, the 4 killed at Chattanooga,
the 14 killed at San Bernardino and the 49 killed at Orlando
would still be alive. Get a God Blessed clue for Chrissake!!!
surveillance
Who commits Islamic terror attacks? Where do they
live and plot their schemes???
Obamination shut down an investigation that could have
prevented the San Bernardino Massacre. Who can get a clue?
Certainly not the Bloody Witch of Benghazi!
Muslim President
You elected a Muslim President in 2008 & 2012.
You damned fools!!! Look what he has done. The Mid East is in flames.
Europe is invaded by Muslim conquerers and gimmigrants. Terrorism is
rampant. He lies about the identity and character of the enemy. He
condemns critics of Islam. He mocks Christianity. He can recite the
Adhan in perfectly accented Arabic. Kiss my arse!
Islam is incompatible with representative self
government:
only Allah has the right to be worshiped. So much
for freedom of religion! Only
Only Allah and his Messenger have the rule to decide
and govern; its Allah's law, not man made law arrived at by debate and
consensus.
Only Muslims are permitted to have authority.
Infidels are not permitted to have
authority even over other infidels. You can not even testify in
an Islamic court!
I disrespectfully direct deniers, doubters &
dissenters to the relevant provisions of "The Reliance Of The
Traveller". It has been scrubbed from the web so I can't link to
it so I will quote it.[Emphasis added for clarity.]
O24.2
Legal testimony is
only acceptable from a witness who:
(a) is free;
(b) is fully legally responsible (mukallaf,
def: c8.1) (O: as testimony is not accepted from a child or insane
person, even when the child's testimony regards injuries among children
that occurred at play);
(c) is able to speak;
(d) it mentally awake;
(e) is
religious (O: meaning upright (o24.4) (A: and Muslim), for Allah
Most High says,
"Let those of rectitude among you testify"
(Koran 65:2),
and unbelief is the vilest form of corruption,
as goes without saying);
M13.2
The necessary
conditions for a person to have custody of a child are:
(a) uprightness (def: o24.4) (O: a corrupt
person may not be a guardian, because child care is a position of
authority, and the corrupt are unqualified for it. Mawardi and Ruyani
hold that outward uprightness (def: m3.3(f) ) is sufficient unless
there is open wrongdoing. If the corruptness of a child's mother
consists of her not performing the prayer (salat), she has no right to
custody of the child, who might grow up to be like her, ending up in
the same vile condition of not praying, for keeping another's company
has its effects);
(b) sanity (O: since a mother uninterruptedly
insane has no right to custody, though if her insanity is slight, such
as a single day per year, her right to custody is not vitiated by it);
(c) and if
the child is Muslim, it is a necessary condition that the person with
custody be a Muslim
(O: because it is a position of authority, and a
non-Muslim has no right to authority and hence no right to raise a
Muslim. If a non-Muslim were given charge of the custody and upbringing
of the child, the child might acquire the character traits of unbelief
(kufr) ).
O25.3: The
Qualifications of a Caliph
(Nawawi:) among the
qualifications of the caliph are that
he be:
(a) Muslim
(H: so that he may see to the best interests of Islam and the Muslims
(K: it
being invalid to appoint a non-Muslims (K: it being invalid to appoint
a non-Muslim (kafir) to authority, even to rule non-Muslim.)
Captain Khan attacked?
If her lips are moving, the Bloody Witch of Benghazi
is lying! Trump did not attack Captain Khan, he called Khan a hero. He
gave a sharp reply to Khan's father, who used the Bronze Star and
Purple Heart as shields to hide behind while calumniating Trump.
Trump should have called her out!
defeat ISIS
Islamic State, Boko Haram, Hamas, Hizbollah and the
rest of the bloody alphabet soup are not the enemy to be defeated.
Muslims are the enemy. Islam is the damnable doctrine that makes them
inimical. Allah commands Muslims: all adult male Muslims of sound mind
and body who are not indebted or enslaved to wage Jihad.
When a sufficient number have reported to the battle, the rest are
excused. But when we retaliate, the whole Ummah is obligated, not just
able bodied adult males.
We need to defeat Muslims and that
requires destroying their faith! [Page 60.] War
against Muslims must be waged on the kinetic and ideological planes.
Muslim Cooperation
Camel Excrement!!! Muslims are our enemies, neither
allies nor partners! Allah explicitly forbids equal and inferior
relationships with Infidels; Muslims must be superior!!! This is a get
yer head out of yer arse moment!!!
war with Muslims
Muslims are the enemy. Islam is the set of doctrines
that makes them inimical. Muslims have a choice; go to war now and
Allah's celestial orgy after they die or go to Hell when they die. The
alternatives are described in
Surah An-Naba'. When a Muslim meets Allah,
his sins will be weighed against his
righteous good deeds. The swing of the
balance determines his destiny. Only participation in Jihad
guarantees forgiveness! Jihad is the Muslim's get
out of Hell Free Card!
Muslims are waging war against them and we need to
retaliate. We need to wipe them off the face of the earth and we need
to get their fifth column out of Dar al-Harb.
religious test
The Constitution forbids religious tests for holding
federal office. It does not forbid consideration of religion in
selecting immigrants.
There is nothing illegal, immoral or
unconstitutional about excluding persons who adhere to a
violent
or subversive belief system. The creed of Islam is called
Aquida,[
Tirmidhi] it lists what Muslims must believe to be
in good standing with Allah.
Click each of those pages to enlarge them, read them and get a clue:
Islam is violent!!! Muslims are at war against us and there is no place
for them here!!!
Maududi: Jihad In Islam,
Page 10-11
Islam
wishes to destroy all states and
governments anywhere on the face of
the earth which are opposed to
the
ideology and programme of Islam
regardless of the country or the
Nation which rules it. The
purpose of Islam is to set up
a state on the basis of its
own ideology and programme, regardless of which nation
assumes the role of the standard-bearer of Islam
or the rule of
which nation is
undermined in the
process of the establishment of an ideological
Islamic State.
t
Islam requires the
earth—not just a portion, but the whole planet—not
because the sovereignty over the earth should be wrested from one
nation or several nations and vested in one particu lar
nation, but because the entire
mankind should benefit from the
ideology and welfare programme or what
would be truer to say from
‘Islam’ which is the programme of
well-being for all humanity. Towards
this end, Islam wishes to press
into service all forces which can
bring about a revolution and a
composite term for the use of all these forces is ‘Jihad’. To change
the outlook of the people and initiate a mental revolution
among them through speech or writing is a form of ‘Jihad’.
To alter the old tyrannical social system and establish a new just
order of life by the power of
sword is also ‘Jihad’ and to
expend goods and exert physically for this cause is
‘Jihad’ too.
Ibn Khaldun: Muquaddiman pg. 308
In the Muslim community, the
holy
war is a religious duty, because of the
universalism of the (Muslim) mission and (the obligation to) convert
everybody to
Islam either by persuasion or by force. Therefore, caliphate
and royal authority are
united in (Islam), so that the person in charge can devote the
available strength to
both of them 408 at the same time.
safe zones
Where there are Muslims, there is no safety. Europe
is not safe in the presence of gimmigrants & rapefugees,
neither is America. No mater where you send those displaced Muslims,
some of them will attack, rob, rape and murder others. You can
not stop others from launching artillery & rocket attacks on
so called safe zones.
The Arab states do not want those 'refugees' 'cuz
they know that those 'refugees' are mainly rebels & rebel
sympathizers who would soon undermine their own regimes.
Refugee Values
If they are Muslims, they value admission to Jannah,
earned by waging war against us. If they are not Christians, they
are almost certainly rebels or rebel sympathizers who will eventually
subvert or revolt against the existing order wherever they go.
poses a risk to us
Every Muslim is obligated to wage war against us; to
punish us for not being Muslims. So long as they believe in Allah,
their presence among us carries a real and proximate threat of
terrorism.
With the Islamic State and al-Qaeda inciting Muslims
to shoot, stab, run over and poison us, their presence here can not be
tolerated. We absolutely must expel them and keep them out. We must not
bring any more Muslims!
cause of suffering
All of the suffering results from the rebellion by
Muslims trying to seize the throne. If they were not attacking
the regime, the regime would not be retaliating. Its a power struggle,
Stupid! Both sides are evil, we have no dog in this fight, there is no
positive outcome and we must get and stay out of it.
Ban Muslims by:
Amend the immigration act of 1990 to make persons
who believe in a deity who requires them to injure, terrorize, enslave,
plunder or kill us excludable. Then enforce it.
causing great distress
The accursed abomination caused great distress to
more than 3000 innocent people. Excluding 20 accursed Muslims including
the "
magnificent nineteen",
would have caused them well deserved distress and saved 3000 innocent
lives. If you object to that, go to Hell and be damned!
Religious Tests:
Implementation
Many Muslim countries stamp religious affiliation on
identity cards. Make visa applicants state their religion on their visa
application. Demand that they show their identity cards. If they claim
to be Christian, ask them to recite their creed. Ask them to display a
baptismal certificate.
Test visa applicants by greeting them with
"As-Salam-u-Alaikum". If they respond to it, exclude them. Tear a page
out of a Koran, toss it on the floor, stomp it and tear it up into the
circular file. If the applicant shows signs of offense, exclude him.
Blame Abe Lincoln?
Thanks to Wikileaks, we have access to the original
statement. The words are hers, not lincolns. She recuits Lincoln's
portrayal in a movie to support her conclusion.
"You just have
to sort of figure out how to -- getting back to that word, "balance"
-- how to balance
the public and the private efforts that are
necessary to be successful, politically, and that's not just a
comment about today. That, I think, has probably been true for all of
our history, and if you saw the Spielberg movie, Lincoln, and how he
was maneuvering and working to get the 13th Amendment passed, and he
called one of my favorite predecessors, Secretary Seward, who had
been the governor and senator from New York, ran against Lincoln for
president, and he told Seward, I need your help to get this done. And
Seward called some of his lobbyist friends who knew how to make a
deal, and they just kept going at it. I mean, politics is like
sausage being made. It is unsavory, and it always has been that
way,
but we usually end up where we need to be. But if everybody's
watching, you know, all of the back room discussions and the deals,
you know, then people get a little nervous, to say the least. So,
you
need both a public and a private position. And finally, I think
-- I
believe in evidence-based decision making. I want to know what the
facts are. I mean, it's like when you guys go into some kind of a
deal, you know, are you going to do that development or not, are you
going to do that renovation or not, you know, you look at the numbers.
You
try to figure out what's going to work and what's not going to work."
[Clinton Speech For National Multi-Housing Council, 4/24/13]
Foreign Influence
How about Obamination's attempt to influence
Israel's election to oust Netanyahu? Evidently it's a one
way street. How about all the
foreign 'leaders' denouncing Trump? Are they
trying to get you elected?
Moderator bias
She denies Trump an opportunity for rebuttal of
lies; standard operating procedure. That is a debait, not a debate.
biased straw man
Raddatz wasted valuable time setting up her straw man premise. No
mention of the Christians slaughtered or driven from their homes. No
mention of the rape victims enslaved. She is only concerned about
Muslim suffering as if it is somehow the responsibility of our
President to solve all the world's problems.
Children are being hurt 'cuz combatants do not
separate themselves from the populations they hold captive; they use
the civilians as human shields. Dictatorial regimes use draconian force
to kill the rebels, causing collateral damage.
What did President Reagan do to stop the shelling of
Hama that killed 10,000 Ikhwan supporters? What could he do, kill
them himself? He sent the Marines to save Arafat's Bacon, how did that
turn out? Its a shame that LibTards
can't learn from history.
keeping Assad in Power
Russia wants to keep arms payments flowing and
maintain a warm water port. Iran wants to establish hegemony and a new
caliphate. You want to depose Assad and replace him with violent rebels
who will expand the Islamic State and use Syria as a base for attacks
on Israel and Jordan. How is your position superior?
no fly zones
What happens when you shoot down a Russian jet over
Aleppo? Do you really want to provoke the bear? Do you really want to
draw another red line in the sand only to be forced to abandon
it? Talk is cheap, lives are not.
rebels: Muslims!
Who does not know who they are? Believing Muslims as
described in Qur'an Verses
8.1-5.
9.111 &
49.15. Al-Qaeda & Islamic State affiliates.
Our enemies trained and armed by Obamination on her watch. You should
be condemning & cursing them and calling for their extinction.
The purpose
Global conquest. That's what Islam is all about.
Obamination! Obama is a damned Muslims! He and his Secretaries Of
State want the enemy to win their war against us 'cuz he is one of
them. Clinton & Kerry think the Muslims will do their wet work,
then they can take over from the Muslims. Obama knows better: the
triumphant Muslims will be invincible.
Do something!
Quit arming, funding & training the enemy and
start bombing them effectively. Wherever their leaders convene, bomb
them. Strafe their funeral processions. Strafe their convoys. Moab
their training camps and assembly areas. Every time they suffer a loss,
mock them: "Where was Allah? Why did he let you suffer a defeat? Where
is the victory he promised?".
how stupid is our country?
Stupid enough to elect and re-elect a damned Muslim
who fights to lose. Obamination wants the enemy to win so he ties the
hads of our troops with suicidal rules of engagement and telegraphs his
strategy to the enemy.
holding territory
That damned fool did not learn the lesson of Vietnam: seize and hold
territory. Once is enough. She ceded several great cities of Iraq to
the enemy. Look at the results! Hit and run worked in the War Of
Revolution 'cuz we had the territory already. It did not work in
Vietnam and it will not work in the Levant 'cuz the enemy has the
territory. She is too stupid to be President.
As a lover of truth, justice, liberty and peace, I condemn in the strongest possible terms the purveyors of hatred, racism, conquest, genocide & terrorism! Come now, Jehovah to judge and condemn Islam and the slaves of Satan: damn them to Hell and cast them into the fire with their accursed demon who is called Allah !!!
Hatred?
Does Islam bring hatred?? Death & Damnation! Click this link and read the most disgusting tafsir & hadith you can imagine http://islamexposed.blogspot.com/2016/03/al-wala-wal-bara-fountainhead-of.html
Allah hates us, and ‘cuz he does, Muslims must and do hate us.
Crack open a Qur’an and read: 5.14, 5.64, 35.39 & 60.4
Racism?
Does Islam bring racism?? Death & Damnation! Open the third volume of “Mishkat Ul-Misabih” and read pages 117- 118. Allah created the Black race to burn: “for the fire”. Open “Muquaddimah” and see also pg 124 . You will find passages in which Ibn Khaldun declares certain Black African tribes to be suitable for slavery and nothing else.
Read also Sahih Bukhari 1.11.664.
Conquest?
Does Islam bring conquest? Read Surah Al-Anfal & Surah At-Taubah and try to deny it! How did Islam build an empire stretching from the border of France to the border of China?? [Click the heading above for more detailed evidence.]
Genocide?
Does Islam bring genocide? Open yer Qur’an to Surah Al-Anfal and read 8.67 “made a great slaughter”! Then turn to Surah Muhammad 47.4 “killed and wounded many of them”! See also 33.26 & Sahih Bukhari 4.52.280.
Terrorism?
Does Islam bring terrorism? Open yer Qur’an and read 3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220. Allah will and did "cast terror", Muslims must 'strike terror" & terrify and Moe was "more of a terror in the hearts of the Jews" & "made victorious with terror".[Click the heading above for more detailed evidence.]
I condemn & curse Islam on the basis of factual knowledge of its tenets: this is not bigotry. Islam tortures, kills and enslaves members of all races, for this I curse and condemn it; this is not racism. Islam is perpetual war, for this I curse and condemn it; this is not prejudice nor is it bigotry; it is common sense.
Islam declares in its Shari’ah, that I must be killed or enslaved for not being a Muslim, for this I condemn and curse it. Look it up, it is found in the second volume of Hedaya: pages 212…216.
Go to Hell, CAIR! Go directly to Hell, do not pass the White House and do not collect Jizya.
If you are a Cleric, administrator or jurist, a legislator or a candidate for high office who, knowing the fatal facts of Islam outlined above, refuse to expose, condemn & curse it, then Go to Hell, traitor to the human race!!!! May Satan seize such by their throats and drop with them into Hell!