Showing posts with label hatred. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hatred. Show all posts
Monday, October 24, 2016
Condemn Islamic Terrorism In The Strongest Possible Terms
Saturday, November 09, 2013
Inncidents Of Intolerance
A/C.3/68/L.48
Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping,stigmatization,
discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons,
based on religion or belief continues with another expresion of deep
concern after welcoming previous resolutions.
If they really cared about the Christians being shot, blown up, burned to death inside their churches and otherwise terrorized in Pakistan, Indonesia, Kenya, Nigeria and Egypt with governments turning a blind eye if not actively supporting the mayhem, perhaps they would send in peace keeping forces to protect the innocent victims instead of sitting around deploring the violence and wringing their hands.
But they do not give a damn about that. Instead they are concerned that Pastor Terry Jones might burn a few thousand Qur'ans. They are concerned about Representative Bachman's letter to an Inspector General inquiring as to why Muslim Brotherhood infiltrators are not properly vetted.
What are "incidents of intollerance"? What is so deplorable about discrimination? Shouldn't we try to expel and exclude the enemy fifth colomun from our midst?
What are "insatances of intolerance"? Would CAIR's demands to shut down speeches by Usama Dakdok and Pamela Geller qualify as "instances of inteolerance", or is it their freedom of expression the UN is bitching about?
Concerned about intolerance? Oh, really? Islamic law states that because we are not Muslims, we must be killed. Does the United Nations have a God blessed clue for Chrissake?
Deeply concerned about incidents of
intolerance, discrimination and violence
against persons based on their religion or belief in all regions of the world,
Deploring any advocacy of discrimination or violence on the basis of religion
or belief,
Strongly deploring all acts of violence against persons on the basis of their
religion or belief, as well as any such acts directed against their homes, businesses,
properties, schools, cultural centres or places of worship,
Strongly deploring, further, all attacks on and in religious places, sites and
shrines in violation of international law, in particular human rights law and
international humanitarian law, including any deliberate destruction of relics and
monuments,
Concerned about actions that wilfully exploit tensions or target individuals on
the basis of their religion or belief,
Expressing deep concern at the instances of intolerance, discrimination and
acts of violence occurring in the world, including cases motivated by discrimination
against persons belonging to religious minorities, in addition to the negative
projection of the followers of religions and the enforcement of measures that
specifically discriminate against persons on the basis of religion or belief,
Expressing concern at the growing manifestations of intolerance based on
religion or belief that can generate hatred and violence among individuals from and
within different nations, which may have serious implications at the national,
regional and international levels, and in this regard emphasizing the importance of
respect for religious and cultural diversity, as well as interfaith and intercultural
dialogue aimed at promoting a culture of tolerance and respect among individuals,
societies and nations,
against persons based on their religion or belief in all regions of the world,
Deploring any advocacy of discrimination or violence on the basis of religion
or belief,
Strongly deploring all acts of violence against persons on the basis of their
religion or belief, as well as any such acts directed against their homes, businesses,
properties, schools, cultural centres or places of worship,
Strongly deploring, further, all attacks on and in religious places, sites and
shrines in violation of international law, in particular human rights law and
international humanitarian law, including any deliberate destruction of relics and
monuments,
Concerned about actions that wilfully exploit tensions or target individuals on
the basis of their religion or belief,
Expressing deep concern at the instances of intolerance, discrimination and
acts of violence occurring in the world, including cases motivated by discrimination
against persons belonging to religious minorities, in addition to the negative
projection of the followers of religions and the enforcement of measures that
specifically discriminate against persons on the basis of religion or belief,
Expressing concern at the growing manifestations of intolerance based on
religion or belief that can generate hatred and violence among individuals from and
within different nations, which may have serious implications at the national,
regional and international levels, and in this regard emphasizing the importance of
respect for religious and cultural diversity, as well as interfaith and intercultural
dialogue aimed at promoting a culture of tolerance and respect among individuals,
societies and nations,
If they really cared about the Christians being shot, blown up, burned to death inside their churches and otherwise terrorized in Pakistan, Indonesia, Kenya, Nigeria and Egypt with governments turning a blind eye if not actively supporting the mayhem, perhaps they would send in peace keeping forces to protect the innocent victims instead of sitting around deploring the violence and wringing their hands.
But they do not give a damn about that. Instead they are concerned that Pastor Terry Jones might burn a few thousand Qur'ans. They are concerned about Representative Bachman's letter to an Inspector General inquiring as to why Muslim Brotherhood infiltrators are not properly vetted.
What are "incidents of intollerance"? What is so deplorable about discrimination? Shouldn't we try to expel and exclude the enemy fifth colomun from our midst?
What are "insatances of intolerance"? Would CAIR's demands to shut down speeches by Usama Dakdok and Pamela Geller qualify as "instances of inteolerance", or is it their freedom of expression the UN is bitching about?
Concerned about intolerance? Oh, really? Islamic law states that because we are not Muslims, we must be killed. Does the United Nations have a God blessed clue for Chrissake?
- http://ia700204.us.archive.org/10/items/hedayaorguideac00hamigoog/hedayaorguideac00hamigoog.pdf#page=154
- http://www.archive.org/stream/hedaysorguide00hamigoog#page/n229/mode/1up
- http://www.shariahthethreat.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/reliance_of_the_traveller.pdf#page=620
- http://www.hoor-al-ayn.com/Books/6%29%20Mashari%20Al-Ashwaq%20ila%20Masari%20al-Ushaaq%20%5BRevised%20Edition%5D.pdf#page=18
- http://www.qurancomplex.com/Quran/Targama/Targama.asp?nSora= 9&l=eng&nAya= 120# 9_ 120
Wednesday, December 21, 2011
Big Lie: "UN drops call to outlaw 'defamation of religions'
There is a sucker born every minute, because if we did not suck, we would not survive. Unfortunately, there is a surplus of adult bottom feeders who will cheerfully take and run with any bait. A Google search for UN + "Defamation of Religions" turned up several news articles in addition to those in yesterday's alert.
| |
-
Turkey and America
The Cutting Edge - Dec 18, 2011[will] help in enacting domestic laws for the countries involved in the issue, as well as formulating international laws preventing inciting hatred resulting from the continued defamation of religions." It unfairly held up the American experience for ... -
Free speech is in the cross hairs
Prospectus - Dec 18, 2011Although the latest resolution refers to "incitement" rather than "defamation" of religion (which appeared in the 2005 resolution), it continues the disingenuous effort to justify crackdowns on religious critics in the name of human rights law. ...
| |
| UN drops call to outlaw 'defamation of religions' msnbc.com AP The call on countries to prohibit "defamation" had been included in a ... decisive break from the polarizing focus in the past on defamation of religions." |
| UN General Assembly Abandons Dangerous “Defamation of Religion ... Human Rights First “Today's unanimous vote marks a decisive break from the polarizing focus in the past on defamation of religions.” said Human Rights First's Tad Stahnke. ... |
| UN condemns religious intolerance, drops 'defamation' Reuters Africa ... religious intolerance without urging states to outlaw "defamation of religions," an appeal critics said opened the door to abusive "blasphemy" laws. ... |
| UN condemns religious intolerance, drops 'defamation' Reuters India L had won majority approval in UN rights bodies in Geneva and at the UN General Assembly for annual resolutions on "combating defamation of religions. ... |
| ||
| UN condemns religious intolerance, drops 'defamation' line for first ... By Louis Charbonneau For the first time in more than a decade, the U.N. General Assembly on Monday condemned religious intolerance without urging states to outlaw defamation of religions, an appeal critics said opened the door to abusive blasphemy laws. FaithWorld |
| ||
| UN drops call to outlaw 'defamation of religions' - Beverly Hills ... Teen BHEF met Tuesday to approve their revised by-laws and present awards of appreciation to Sandy West of The Beverly Hilton and Corrine Verdery of Oasis ... www.bhcourier.com/article/World/World/UN.../83854 | ||
| UN drops call to outlaw 'defamation of religions' - TODAY News ... The U.N. General Assembly on Monday condemned religious intolerance without urging states to outlaw "defamation of religions." today.msnbc.msn.com/id/45726263/ | ||
| UN drops call to outlaw 'defamation of religions' - Newsvine 'Governments should now focus on concrete measures to fight religiously motivated violence ... while recognizing the importance of freedom of expression,' ... world-news.polls.newsvine.com/_.../9561504-un-drops-call-to... |
The new session of the Council is also coincides with with regrettable events that are
deliberately meant to defame religions as well incite hatred, xenophobia, discrimination and
violence against religions, in particular Islam. The increasing incidents of violence and
discrimination on the basis of religion must not be ignored. We hope that this and other
related issues remain an important priority in the work of the Council. The most recent and unfortunate in the series of such events was the announcement
pertaining to Bum a Koran Day. It was highly provocative towards the religious sentiments
of Muslims everywhere in the world and must be condemned in the strongest possible terms.
On August 24,2010 I issued a cautionary statement on the plan to burn the Holy Qur'an and
urged the American people as a whole as well as the world community to reject the call of the
Gainesville Church pastor[....] In this regard all xenophobic campaigns of fear mongering and discriminatory
measures - both in policy and practice - which restrict, prohibit or discriminate against of any
religion such as ban on the constriction of minarets, organization of events that incite hatred
like Burn a Koran Day, and other discriminatory measures must be strongly condemned by
the international community. A recurrence of such events substantiate OIC's call for a
normative approach to deal with this menace that continues to pose a clear 'and present danger
to peace, security 'and stability in the regional as well as the global context. Such acts fuel
discrimination, extremism and mis-perception leading to polarization and fragmentation with
dangerous unintendecl ancl unforeseen consequences.[...] [...]such events which endanger peaceful coexistence
between nations and create an environment conducive to violence
deliberately meant to defame religions as well incite hatred, xenophobia, discrimination and
violence against religions, in particular Islam. The increasing incidents of violence and
discrimination on the basis of religion must not be ignored. We hope that this and other
related issues remain an important priority in the work of the Council. The most recent and unfortunate in the series of such events was the announcement
pertaining to Bum a Koran Day. It was highly provocative towards the religious sentiments
of Muslims everywhere in the world and must be condemned in the strongest possible terms.
On August 24,2010 I issued a cautionary statement on the plan to burn the Holy Qur'an and
urged the American people as a whole as well as the world community to reject the call of the
Gainesville Church pastor[....] In this regard all xenophobic campaigns of fear mongering and discriminatory
measures - both in policy and practice - which restrict, prohibit or discriminate against of any
religion such as ban on the constriction of minarets, organization of events that incite hatred
like Burn a Koran Day, and other discriminatory measures must be strongly condemned by
the international community. A recurrence of such events substantiate OIC's call for a
normative approach to deal with this menace that continues to pose a clear 'and present danger
to peace, security 'and stability in the regional as well as the global context. Such acts fuel
discrimination, extremism and mis-perception leading to polarization and fragmentation with
dangerous unintendecl ancl unforeseen consequences.[...] [...]such events which endanger peaceful coexistence
between nations and create an environment conducive to violence
The first three sentences quoted above are loaded with meaning which must be dissected and examined.
regrettable events
In this case, one event: International Burn The Qur'an Day, which was scheduled for 09/11/10 to commemorate the accursed abomination by highlighting the Qur'an verses which inspired it. The event was called off under intense government pressure.deliberately meant to
How does anyone know the intention of the event unless it is clearly stated? The stated purpose of the event was to foster awareness of Islamic doctrines and their real world consequences. But Ihsanoglu assigns other intentions which he projects onto the event from afar.defame religions
Defamation is false and malicious. What is false about connecting the dots; Allah's sanctification of terror, his casting terror resulting in death, captivity & dispossession, Moe's bragging about terror making him victorious and the abominable act motivated by Allah's imperative, threat and promise?incite
Pastor Jones was not inciting anyone to do anything more than incinerate the book which inspired the "Magnificent 19". Nothing was to be said, implied or illustrate to incite anyone to assault Muslims. He issued no war cry or call to arms and implied none.hatred
It is only natural for a nation under attack and threat of attack to hate its attackers and the damnable doctrines which motivate them and inspire them to attempt genocide & politicide. No incitement is needed to make intelligent and informed Americans hate Islam.discrimination
People naturally make choices. If we choose to avoid association with and proximity to persons made inimical to us by their ideology, that is discrimination, but it is not evil. Hating a man for his skin pigment is evil. Hating a man because he adheres to an ideology which enjoins him to kill or enslave you is not evil, it is common sense. Warning people about that ideology and its consequences is not inciting hatred. Hatred is incited by the ideology and the acts it inspires.violence
When Pastor Jones tried and burned a Qur'an in March of 2011, rioting broke out in Pakistan. The riots were not incited by anything in Gainesville, they were incited by what was preached in the mosques at Jumah Salat. The politicians and media dare not make the connection between the riots and the end of Friday afternoon sermons. Instead, they prefer to blame an unrelated event separated by thousands of miles and several days.events that incite hatred
Beirut Embassy bombing
USS Cole bombing
WTC1
WTC2
Beslan Massacre
Mumbai Massacre
London subway bombing
Madrid rail bombing
endanger peaceful coexistence
Trying and burning a Qur'an did not start a war; what did? have you forgotten? When such a threat is issued, why do we lift Satan's tail and pucker up? Defamation, while prominently cited, is not the issue. Examine this transcript of remarks by Pakistan's Ambassador at the 16th session of the HRC.Pakistan (on behalf of
the OIC)
Mr. Zamir Akram
03/24/11 Thank you Mr. President. On behalf of the OIC countries, I have the
honor to introduce the draft resolution entitled “combating
intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization of and
discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons
based on religion or belief contained in document L.38. Mr. President: this resolution addresses a number of
issues over which the OIC has been expressing concern over the years.
having said that, I wish to state categorically that this
resolution does not replace earlier resolutions on combating
defamation. which were adopted by the Human Rights Council and
remain valid. This resolution L.38 is an attempt on the
part of the oic to build consensus on an issue of vital importance
not only to Muslims but to people of all religions and beliefs by
identifying ways and means to deal with the growing problems of
religious incitement and discrimination and incitement to hatred and violence based on
religion or belief. At the heart of this resolution are a series of practical steps
which need to be taken by states in order to address
this problem. This resolution addresses the core issues in a manner
that is acceptable to all including in a legal sense, thus
seeking to bring all stake holders on board. The OIC has gone
the extra mile to maintain a spirit of constructive engagement with all
partners during this process of consultation. Our primary objective is to ensure that this text,
which will hopefully be adopted by consensus, will bind us all to the
commitments contained therein and oblige us all to ensure compliance
with its decisions. Mr. President: Muslims around the world continue to be confronted
with ever increasing instances of intolerance, negative stereotyping,
stigmatization, discrimination and violence on the basis of their religion; Islam.
Objective academic studies reveal that following the end of the cold war, the
pernicious doctrine of a clash of civilizations signaled the start of a narrative that required
the construction of a new enemy to replace the global threat of
Communism with the so-called menace of Islam. The reprehensible acts of terrorism on September 11,
2001 provided the trigger to unleash the clash of civilizations to the
forefront of global politics. In the general Western view, no
distinction was made between a handful of extremists and terrorists and
the overwhelming majority of peaceful and law abiding Muslims
living around the world. To make matters worse, against the backdrop of
the recent global economic crisis, these fears of Islam and Muslims are
now being manipulated by irresponsible and bigoted Western politicians
to gain political mileage in their countries, unfortunately, with
remarkable success. Terms such as Islamofascists have become common.
Even the Qur’an has not been spared; it has been compared to Hitler’s
Mein Kampf. More recently, it was tried for religious crimes and
burnt. Minarets at mosques deliberately depicted on posters
as missiles, have been banned. There have even been restrictions on
shops selling halal food, while no such restrictions exist on kosher
food outlets which are similar. There is also increasing discrimination against Muslims in various
parts of the world. They are being subjected to racial profiling
which confronts them with intractable problems at every border where
they are checked and re-checked. Their businesses are repeatedly
scrutinized and their places of worship disallowed or desecrated.
They are made to feel unwelcome in societies where they live as
minorities. One prominent politician has recently organized
hearings that seek to put on trial the entire Muslim community and are
obviously designed to stoke fears against Muslims in that
country. Mr. President, the efforts by the oic to defend
our religion, our holy book and our prophet and our people have
often been misrepresented as being contrary to international human
rights principles and laws, and in particular, rejected as undermining
the freedom of expression or opinion. The reality is different.
It is therefore appropriate in such a position, for us to try and
explain our faith and our principles. I hope, Mr. President, you will
give me a bit of extra time to do so. Mr. President: the Qur’an lays great emphasis on the
need for religious tolerance as well as freedom of thought and
opinion. In chapter 2, verse 256, the Qur’an states there is no
compulsion in religion. In chapter 18, verse 29, the Qur’an
maintains that truth is from your Lord, so let him who please believe
and him who please disbelieve. As regards freedom of
thought and opinion in Islam, the Qur’an states, in chapter 16, in verse 125 invite
all to the way of your creator with wisdom and arguments that are the
best and most gracious. The Qur’an and the traditions of the holy
prophet also lay emphasis on the treatment of non-Muslims.
According to Prophet Muhammad, (PBUH), he who hurts a non-Muslim
citizen of a Muslim state I am his adversary and I shall be his
adversary on the day of judgment. Mr. President: it is also instructive for us to know
that we Muslims are not only bound by temporal laws to respect human
rights but by divine enjunctions contained in the Qur’an. The
basic human rights as ordained in the Qur’an include the
rights to life, individual freedom, justice, equality, privacy, association
and basic necessities of life or minimum standard of living. These
obligations also include respect for women, equality among human
beings, freedom of expression, protection from arbitrary imprisonment
and the right to oppose tyranny and injustice. the last sermon of
the prophet (PBUH) is, in itself, a comprehensive charter of human
rights. Islam has even established a complete code for the right
of combatants in war. Measures for the protection of all combatants as
well as homes and property belonging to them. Mr. President: I have dwelt at length on these characteristics of Islam
because I want to underscore the common principles that underlie our
faith and the requirements of international law including international
human rights and humanitarian law. Indeed, given the tremendous
contributions by Islam in various fields of human activity over
the years, these principles have contributed to the evolution of
the very principles that we are trying to uphold today. Mr. President, we sincerely believe that that irrespective of our
different cultural backgrounds and traditions, there is a shared
interest for all of us to show respect for each other’s religions and
beliefs as well as to prevent any advocacy of religious hatred and
intolerance, discrimination and incitement on the basis of religion or
belief. The resolution under consideration seeks to achieve
these laudable objectives through a range of actions by states
including administrative steps, measures to criminalize imminent
violence, training and awareness programs, promotion of dialogue and
understanding at all levels. The resolution also calls for
a global dialogue for the promotion of a culture of tolerance and peace
and in this context it decides to convene a panel discussion in the
Human Rights Council. We hope that this resolution will be
adopted by consensus. Before concluding, Mr. President, I would
like to place on record my appreciation for the support and cooperation
of all my colleagues in the oic and in particular, members of
the core group of ambassadors that we set up to work out this
resolution. I have truly benefited from the wisdom and advice and
without their support this text would not have been possible. I
would also like to thank the Secretary General of the oic whose
support and guidance made this resolution possible. In addition I
would like to express my appreciation — my sincere appreciation to all
our partners in the various groups, especially the ambassadors of the
U.S. and the U.K. on behalf of the European Union for their cooperative
and constructive approach. Let me also thank the ambassadors from
the African group, grulac and Croatia for their cooperation and
engagement in this effort. I am glad that this oic initiative has
met with broad cross regional support which will send out a strong
message of unity from this council. Finally I would like to thank
the experts from Pakistan, the U.S., the U.K. and other countries for
their tireless efforts to work out the text of this resolution. I thank
you Mr. president.
the OIC)
Mr. Zamir Akram
03/24/11 Thank you Mr. President. On behalf of the OIC countries, I have the
honor to introduce the draft resolution entitled “combating
intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization of and
discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons
based on religion or belief contained in document L.38. Mr. President: this resolution addresses a number of
issues over which the OIC has been expressing concern over the years.
having said that, I wish to state categorically that this
resolution does not replace earlier resolutions on combating
defamation. which were adopted by the Human Rights Council and
remain valid. This resolution L.38 is an attempt on the
part of the oic to build consensus on an issue of vital importance
not only to Muslims but to people of all religions and beliefs by
identifying ways and means to deal with the growing problems of
religious incitement and discrimination and incitement to hatred and violence based on
religion or belief. At the heart of this resolution are a series of practical steps
which need to be taken by states in order to address
this problem. This resolution addresses the core issues in a manner
that is acceptable to all including in a legal sense, thus
seeking to bring all stake holders on board. The OIC has gone
the extra mile to maintain a spirit of constructive engagement with all
partners during this process of consultation. Our primary objective is to ensure that this text,
which will hopefully be adopted by consensus, will bind us all to the
commitments contained therein and oblige us all to ensure compliance
with its decisions. Mr. President: Muslims around the world continue to be confronted
with ever increasing instances of intolerance, negative stereotyping,
stigmatization, discrimination and violence on the basis of their religion; Islam.
Objective academic studies reveal that following the end of the cold war, the
pernicious doctrine of a clash of civilizations signaled the start of a narrative that required
the construction of a new enemy to replace the global threat of
Communism with the so-called menace of Islam. The reprehensible acts of terrorism on September 11,
2001 provided the trigger to unleash the clash of civilizations to the
forefront of global politics. In the general Western view, no
distinction was made between a handful of extremists and terrorists and
the overwhelming majority of peaceful and law abiding Muslims
living around the world. To make matters worse, against the backdrop of
the recent global economic crisis, these fears of Islam and Muslims are
now being manipulated by irresponsible and bigoted Western politicians
to gain political mileage in their countries, unfortunately, with
remarkable success. Terms such as Islamofascists have become common.
Even the Qur’an has not been spared; it has been compared to Hitler’s
Mein Kampf. More recently, it was tried for religious crimes and
burnt. Minarets at mosques deliberately depicted on posters
as missiles, have been banned. There have even been restrictions on
shops selling halal food, while no such restrictions exist on kosher
food outlets which are similar. There is also increasing discrimination against Muslims in various
parts of the world. They are being subjected to racial profiling
which confronts them with intractable problems at every border where
they are checked and re-checked. Their businesses are repeatedly
scrutinized and their places of worship disallowed or desecrated.
They are made to feel unwelcome in societies where they live as
minorities. One prominent politician has recently organized
hearings that seek to put on trial the entire Muslim community and are
obviously designed to stoke fears against Muslims in that
country. Mr. President, the efforts by the oic to defend
our religion, our holy book and our prophet and our people have
often been misrepresented as being contrary to international human
rights principles and laws, and in particular, rejected as undermining
the freedom of expression or opinion. The reality is different.
It is therefore appropriate in such a position, for us to try and
explain our faith and our principles. I hope, Mr. President, you will
give me a bit of extra time to do so. Mr. President: the Qur’an lays great emphasis on the
need for religious tolerance as well as freedom of thought and
opinion. In chapter 2, verse 256, the Qur’an states there is no
compulsion in religion. In chapter 18, verse 29, the Qur’an
maintains that truth is from your Lord, so let him who please believe
and him who please disbelieve. As regards freedom of
thought and opinion in Islam, the Qur’an states, in chapter 16, in verse 125 invite
all to the way of your creator with wisdom and arguments that are the
best and most gracious. The Qur’an and the traditions of the holy
prophet also lay emphasis on the treatment of non-Muslims.
According to Prophet Muhammad, (PBUH), he who hurts a non-Muslim
citizen of a Muslim state I am his adversary and I shall be his
adversary on the day of judgment. Mr. President: it is also instructive for us to know
that we Muslims are not only bound by temporal laws to respect human
rights but by divine enjunctions contained in the Qur’an. The
basic human rights as ordained in the Qur’an include the
rights to life, individual freedom, justice, equality, privacy, association
and basic necessities of life or minimum standard of living. These
obligations also include respect for women, equality among human
beings, freedom of expression, protection from arbitrary imprisonment
and the right to oppose tyranny and injustice. the last sermon of
the prophet (PBUH) is, in itself, a comprehensive charter of human
rights. Islam has even established a complete code for the right
of combatants in war. Measures for the protection of all combatants as
well as homes and property belonging to them. Mr. President: I have dwelt at length on these characteristics of Islam
because I want to underscore the common principles that underlie our
faith and the requirements of international law including international
human rights and humanitarian law. Indeed, given the tremendous
contributions by Islam in various fields of human activity over
the years, these principles have contributed to the evolution of
the very principles that we are trying to uphold today. Mr. President, we sincerely believe that that irrespective of our
different cultural backgrounds and traditions, there is a shared
interest for all of us to show respect for each other’s religions and
beliefs as well as to prevent any advocacy of religious hatred and
intolerance, discrimination and incitement on the basis of religion or
belief. The resolution under consideration seeks to achieve
these laudable objectives through a range of actions by states
including administrative steps, measures to criminalize imminent
violence, training and awareness programs, promotion of dialogue and
understanding at all levels. The resolution also calls for
a global dialogue for the promotion of a culture of tolerance and peace
and in this context it decides to convene a panel discussion in the
Human Rights Council. We hope that this resolution will be
adopted by consensus. Before concluding, Mr. President, I would
like to place on record my appreciation for the support and cooperation
of all my colleagues in the oic and in particular, members of
the core group of ambassadors that we set up to work out this
resolution. I have truly benefited from the wisdom and advice and
without their support this text would not have been possible. I
would also like to thank the Secretary General of the oic whose
support and guidance made this resolution possible. In addition I
would like to express my appreciation — my sincere appreciation to all
our partners in the various groups, especially the ambassadors of the
U.S. and the U.K. on behalf of the European Union for their cooperative
and constructive approach. Let me also thank the ambassadors from
the African group, grulac and Croatia for their cooperation and
engagement in this effort. I am glad that this oic initiative has
met with broad cross regional support which will send out a strong
message of unity from this council. Finally I would like to thank
the experts from Pakistan, the U.S., the U.K. and other countries for
their tireless efforts to work out the text of this resolution. I thank
you Mr. president.
Akram's screed contains numerous lies, which have been dissected in another blog post.
number of issues
To see what Akram was talking about, read the Islamophobia Report for April '11. The three principal exemplars are the Motoons, Fitna and the above mentioned Qur'an burning.Motoons
The ostensible objection to depicting Moe is idolatry. There are two problems with that. First, Moe ain't supposed to be the deity, Allah is. Second, nobody would possibly make those cartoons an object of idolatry. The real reason for objecting to their publication is their depicting Moe as a terrorist. Moe could not have possessed a bomb because he died prior to the invention of gunpowder. Moe cast terror by a series of barbarian attacks, deliberately building a reputation for barbarian repine, so that he was more feared than Allah. Moe bragged about being made victorious by awe & terror. What more do you need to know to make a judgment?Fitna
The 15 minute documentary juxtaposes Qur'an verses and ahadith with the rabid rants of Imams at Jumah Salat and resulting acts of terror and rioting. Fitna does not incite violence, it exposes incitement. Fitna: Supporting Documentation 03/27/08 documents the ayat quoted in the documentary. Though words have meanings, we must be aware of the meanings intended by Muslims. HRC 16/18 & Draft resolution XVII appear to concentrate on incitement.Condemns any advocacy of religious hatred that constitutes incitement to
discrimination, hostility or violence, whether it involves the use of print, audiovisual
or electronic media or any other means;
discrimination, hostility or violence, whether it involves the use of print, audiovisual
or electronic media or any other means;
(e) Speaking out against intolerance, including advocacy of religious hatred
that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence;
(0 Adopting measures to criminalize the incitement to imminent violence
based on religion or belief;
that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence;
(0 Adopting measures to criminalize the incitement to imminent violence
based on religion or belief;
incitement
What is it? Am I inciting hatred and violence by exposing the damnable doctrines of Islam which inculcate hatred and incite violence? There is only one way to know the meaning: we must examine recent exemplary statements. This one, by Secretary Ban Ki-moon is dispositive.Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about Fitna:"There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence," Ban said in a statement. "The right of free expression is not at stake here."
According to the Secretary General, Fitna constitutes hate speech & incitement not protected by freedom of expression. From that statement, it is clear tha the intention of HRC 16/18 and Draft resolution XVII is to criminalize all criticism of Islam.
negative stereotyping
What is the difference between stereotyping and defamation? Because Moe was a terrorist, who commanded Muslims to emulate himself, and because Allah commanded terrorism, Muslims are commanded to obey Allah and because selectivity is prohibited, all Muslims are potential terrorists. To the extent that they are believers in Allah, his promise and his threat, they will eventually participate in an attack. If it were not true, this paragraph would be defamatory. Even though it is true, it is negative and it is stereotyping, condemned by the resolutions. In any case,defamation
Islam is terrorism! Allah sanctified it & engaged in it. Moe bragged about being made victorious by it. To those bigots who who deny the obvious facts previously documented by reference to the Qur'an & hadth, this is defamatory. Previous resolutions condemned associating Islam with terrorism. These resolutions omit that meme, so, has the UN abandoned the defamation meme? HELL NO!!! And I will prove it. Draft resolution XVII ain't the only resolution passed by acclamation Dec. 19. I know something you don't know but are about to find out.Also emphasizes that no religion should be equated with terrorism, as this
may have adverse consequences on the enjoyment of the right to freedom of religion
or belief of all members of the religious communities concerned;
may have adverse consequences on the enjoyment of the right to freedom of religion
or belief of all members of the religious communities concerned;
¶10, on page 3 of Draft resolution XVIII, emphasizes that Islam must not be equated with terrorism, which it is by the testimony of its own deity & founder previously cited. Equation with terrorism fits the defamation meme, and it has not been dropped or abandoned by the UN, it lives on in a concurrent resolution. The suckers have swallowed the bait, hook, line and sinker. ¶12(j), on page 4, belies the assertion that freedom of expression is not threatened.
To take all necessary and appropriate action, in conformity with
international standards of human rights, to combat hatred, discrimination,
intolerance and acts of violence, intimidation and coercion motivated by intolerance
based on religion or belief, as well as incitement to hostility and violence, with
particular regard to members of religious minorities in all parts of the world;
international standards of human rights, to combat hatred, discrimination,
intolerance and acts of violence, intimidation and coercion motivated by intolerance
based on religion or belief, as well as incitement to hostility and violence, with
particular regard to members of religious minorities in all parts of the world;
For the Morons among my readers, "all necessary and appropriate action" means legislation to combat "incitement to hostility and violence", which means: Fitna, the Motoons and this blog post. No doubt the Moronic chorus will begin chanting: "that ain't in the resolution under discussion". To which I gleefully reply: Ye Suckers!!! Assumptions make asses of you!
Adopting measures to criminalize the incitement to imminent violence
based on religion or belief;
based on religion or belief;
¶5(f) on page 5 of Draft resolution XVII, proves you wrong. "Adopting measures to criminalize" is a code phrase for legislation. They are demanding passage & enforcement to establish criminal punishment for publications such as Fitna, the Motoons and this blog post. Remember, Ban Ki-Moon defined the terms for us.
"U.N. Tackles Religious Intolerance without Limiting Free Speech"
Legislation to criminalize the publication of Fitna, the Motoons and this blog post will not limit free speech. Yeah, right ;=( If you love liberty, you will sign, share and promote this petition to preserve the First Amendment against the above described resolutions and the Istanbul Process. http://www.petition2congress.com/5741/preserve-first-amendment-from-attack-by-oic/
Monday, September 27, 2010
International Burn a Qur'an Day: Fan the Embers!
The pr campaign initiated by Pastor Terry Jones, though it ended in a fizzle, afforded us an opportunity to expose the evil contents of that abominable book. In Washington D.C., at the White House, two courageous men revealed the contents and crumpled pages from a translation. In New York, near the site of the proposed Ground Zero mosque, one brave man burned pages torn from a translation.
Islam has nothing to kvetch about because:
Yet Muslims are bitching like a nervous little dog tied up outside, cold, hungry & lonely: barking incessantly. Their barking is both a threat to our liberty and an opportunity to expose Islam's damnable doctrines. We must repulse the threat and exploit the opportunity.
The U.N. has equated opposition to Islam with racism. Islam is not a race. Arab is a race; Islam, invented by an Arab, enslaves Arabs, Africans, Asians & Europeans. If we condemn Islam's sanctification of mandatory genocidal conquest through terrorism, we are automatically branded as racist. The intent is to silence us; to shut down debate arbitrarily.
Noting with deep concern the instances of intolerance, discrimination, profiling and
acts of violence against Muslims occurring in many parts of the world,
This term of opprobrium, delivered in the absence of definition and evidence, constitutes libel and slander. Pakistan's delegate ought to be sued for libel and so should the UNHRC when it passes that resolution.
ICCPR
That just happens to be an international human rights covenant, legally binding on and enforceable against signatories.
If that ain't propaganda for war, what the Hell is? ICCPR 20.1 requires that it be proscribed by law. Who will enforce 20.1?
If the cited ayat ain't incitement to & the cited Shari'an ain't discrimination against Jews & Christians, what the Hell is? ICCPR 20.2 requires that it be proscribed by law.l Who will enforce 20.2?
It is expected that the draft resolution condemning International Burn a Qur'an Day will be debated and voted on this week. It is certain that it will pass because the OIC and its allies have a majority of seats in the HRC. This gives us a brief moment of opportunity. Let us seize it!!
The link is to an html formatted copy which contains links to source texts. At the end of the text, it contains a signature link. I urge you to copy the petition, paste it into an email and send it to everyone you can hope to influence with an exhortation to sign and forward it. Signing and promoting this petition is the best hope we have of prevailing over an existential foe which seeks to silence our protest against its intention to enslave us.
U.N. resolutions are not binding, they lack the force of law. ICERD can be enforced. At the end of November, the Ad Hoc Committee for the Elaboration of Complementary Standards will meet to write the resolutions into ICERD. You can kiss the First Amendment goodbye, because it will be passed, signed and ratified.
Our only hope of retaining our liberty rests in raising the cost of this attack above the price Islam is willing to pay. We must link full exposure of the Qur'an's evil contents to their attack against our free expression right. We must do it now, while it is still legally possible.
Act now if you love liberty and want to preserve it for yourself and your progeny. Sign and propagate the International Qur'an Petition. Copy and cross post this blog post. Seize the opportunity, it may be our last.
Islam has nothing to kvetch about because:
- Pastor Jones abandoned the burning ceremony.
- The crumpled Qur'an was a translation, not Arabic.
- The burned Qur'an was a translation, not Arabic.
Yet Muslims are bitching like a nervous little dog tied up outside, cold, hungry & lonely: barking incessantly. Their barking is both a threat to our liberty and an opportunity to expose Islam's damnable doctrines. We must repulse the threat and exploit the opportunity.
threat:
On September 22, 2010, Pakistan's delegate to the United Nations Human Rights Council submitted a draft resolution condemning International Burn a Qur'an Day. The draft is a single page packed with feces, some old and stale, some fresh and pungent. [Emphasis added to quotes for clarity.]stale feces
The preamble contains abusive perversion by reference to the U.N. Charter, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, ICERD & ICCPR. It continues with a disingenuous call for one sided inter-cultural dialogue. It extends its spew of feces by conflating criticism of Islam with racism by reference to the United Nations Millennium Declaration. It aggravates the offense by conflating criticism with physical violence.- Reaffirming the pledge made by all States under the Charter of the United Nations to
promote and encourage universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental
freedoms for all, without distinction as to race, sex, language or religion,
- Reaffirming also that all human rights are universal, indivisible, interdependent and interrelated,
- Reaffirming further that discrimination between human beings on the grounds of
religion or belief constitutes an affront to human dignity and a disavowal of the principles of
the Charter of the United Nations, and shall be condemned as a violation of the human rights
and fundamental freedoms proclaimed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and
enunciated in detail in the International Covenants on Human Rights, and as an obstacle to
friendly and peaceful relations between nations,
- Welcoming also the resolve expressed in the United Nations Millennium Declaration,
adopted by the General Assembly in its resolution 55/2 on 8 September 2000, to take
measures to eliminate the increasing acts of racism and xenophobia in many societies and to
promote greater harmony and tolerance in all societies, and looking forward to its effective implementation at all levels, [Emphasis added.]
4. Emphasizes the urgent need to address the scourges of anti-Semitism, Christianophobia, and Islamophobia as contemporary forms of racism as well as racial and violent movements based on racism and discriminatory ideas directed at African, Arab, Christian, Jewish, Muslim and other communities;
The U.N. has equated opposition to Islam with racism. Islam is not a race. Arab is a race; Islam, invented by an Arab, enslaves Arabs, Africans, Asians & Europeans. If we condemn Islam's sanctification of mandatory genocidal conquest through terrorism, we are automatically branded as racist. The intent is to silence us; to shut down debate arbitrarily.
fresh feces
The novel crap is contained in a five point enumerated list of action items.Noting with deep concern the instances of intolerance, discrimination, profiling and
acts of violence against Muslims occurring in many parts of the world,
- Condemns in this regard the recent call by an extremist group to organize a ‘Burn a Koran Day’;
- Condemns also any advocacy of religious hatred that constitutes incitement to I hatred, discrimination, hostility or violence;
- Calls upon the international community to stand united against such events which undermine peaceful coexistence between nations and create an environment conducive to violence; reprisal
- Calls upon also all States to condemn and oppose, in accordance with their obligations, under international human rights law, any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to hatred, discrimination, hostility and violence;
- Urges the international community to support all international and regional initiatives to promote cross-cultural and interfaith harmony.
extremist group
Extremist connotes violent tendencies. In common parlance, the Muslims who slaughter innocents in the name of Allah are labeled "extremists". Who has Pastor Jones and his Dove World Outreach Center threatened? Who have they assaulted? Who have they killed? They condemned and expressed an intention to burn the book which inspires & motivates terrorists. What is extreme about that?This term of opprobrium, delivered in the absence of definition and evidence, constitutes libel and slander. Pakistan's delegate ought to be sued for libel and so should the UNHRC when it passes that resolution.
incitement
Exactly what did Pastor Jones say that incited anyone to hate Muslims? Exactly what did he say that incited anyone to assault Muslims? Precisely who acted on that incitement? Did he brandish a sword and shout "Crusade, Crusade, Crusade! ?undermine peaceful coexistence
Did Pastor Jones call for war? Did his congregation march upon Pakistan's embassy hurling snones and firebombs? Who rioted? Who incited them to riot? Did they listen to the Pastor's sermon or their Imam's Kutbah at Juma Salat?condemn and oppose
President Obama, Secretary of State Clinton & General Petraeus condemned and opposed International Burn a Qur'an Day. They met their obligations. What more do you demand? Note the repetition of boiler plate from an earlier point. What is its source?ICCPR
Article 20
- Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.
- Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.
The United Nations
INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON
CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS
INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON
CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS
That just happens to be an international human rights covenant, legally binding on and enforceable against signatories.
opportunity
The enemy has pointed out our best weapon against it! We have an opportunity to pick up and deploy that weapon.demand enforcement of Art. 20!
- Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.
2:216. Jihâd (holy fighting in Allâh's Cause) is ordained for you (Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing which is good for you and that you like a thing which is bad for you. Allâh knows but you do not know.
8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.
9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to the earth? Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.
9:39. If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allâh is Able to do all things.
9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious - see V.2:2
61:10. O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment.
61:11. That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know!
61:12. (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of 'Adn Eternity ['Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success.
8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.
9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to the earth? Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.
9:39. If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allâh is Able to do all things.
9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious - see V.2:2
61:10. O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment.
61:11. That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know!
61:12. (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of 'Adn Eternity ['Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success.
If that ain't propaganda for war, what the Hell is? ICCPR 20.1 requires that it be proscribed by law. Who will enforce 20.1?
- Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.
1:6. Guide us to the Straight Way
1:7. The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray (such as the Christians).
2:161. Verily, those who disbelieve, and die while they are disbelievers, it is they on whom is the Curse of Allâh and of the angels and of mankind, combined.
98:6. Verily, those who disbelieve (in the religion of Islâm, the Qur'ân and Prophet Muhammad ()) from among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) and Al-Mushrikûn will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are the worst of creatures.
98:7. Verily, those who believe [in the Oneness of Allâh, and in His Messenger Muhammad ()) including all obligations ordered by Islâm] and do righteous good deeds, they are the best of creatures.
Reliance of the Traveller, o.11.5 lists discriminations against non-Muslim subjects.
1:7. The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray (such as the Christians).
2:161. Verily, those who disbelieve, and die while they are disbelievers, it is they on whom is the Curse of Allâh and of the angels and of mankind, combined.
98:6. Verily, those who disbelieve (in the religion of Islâm, the Qur'ân and Prophet Muhammad ()) from among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) and Al-Mushrikûn will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are the worst of creatures.
98:7. Verily, those who believe [in the Oneness of Allâh, and in His Messenger Muhammad ()) including all obligations ordered by Islâm] and do righteous good deeds, they are the best of creatures.
Reliance of the Traveller, o.11.5 lists discriminations against non-Muslim subjects.
-2- are distinguished from Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar);
-3- are not greeted with "as-Salamu 'alaykum";
-4- must keep to the side of the street;
-5- may not build higher than or as high as the Muslims' buildings, though if they acquire a tall house, it is not razed;
-6- are forbidden to openly display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their funerals and feastdays;
-7- and are forbidden to build new churches.
If the cited ayat ain't incitement to & the cited Shari'an ain't discrimination against Jews & Christians, what the Hell is? ICCPR 20.2 requires that it be proscribed by law.l Who will enforce 20.2?
It is expected that the draft resolution condemning International Burn a Qur'an Day will be debated and voted on this week. It is certain that it will pass because the OIC and its allies have a majority of seats in the HRC. This gives us a brief moment of opportunity. Let us seize it!!
International Qur'an Petition
The petition linked immediately above cites the relevant provisions of ICCPR, ICERD & CPPCG and the Islamic doctrines which violate them. It prays to the World Court for enforcement of those provisions which require civilized signatories to outlaw Islam.The link is to an html formatted copy which contains links to source texts. At the end of the text, it contains a signature link. I urge you to copy the petition, paste it into an email and send it to everyone you can hope to influence with an exhortation to sign and forward it. Signing and promoting this petition is the best hope we have of prevailing over an existential foe which seeks to silence our protest against its intention to enslave us.
U.N. resolutions are not binding, they lack the force of law. ICERD can be enforced. At the end of November, the Ad Hoc Committee for the Elaboration of Complementary Standards will meet to write the resolutions into ICERD. You can kiss the First Amendment goodbye, because it will be passed, signed and ratified.
Our only hope of retaining our liberty rests in raising the cost of this attack above the price Islam is willing to pay. We must link full exposure of the Qur'an's evil contents to their attack against our free expression right. We must do it now, while it is still legally possible.
Act now if you love liberty and want to preserve it for yourself and your progeny. Sign and propagate the International Qur'an Petition. Copy and cross post this blog post. Seize the opportunity, it may be our last.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
As a lover of truth, justice, liberty and peace, I condemn in the strongest possible terms the purveyors of hatred, racism, conquest, genocide & terrorism! Come now, Jehovah to judge and condemn Islam and the slaves of Satan: damn them to Hell and cast them into the fire with their accursed demon who is called Allah !!!
Hatred?
Does Islam bring hatred?? Death & Damnation! Click this link and read the most disgusting tafsir & hadith you can imagine http://islamexposed.blogspot.com/2016/03/al-wala-wal-bara-fountainhead-of.html
Allah hates us, and ‘cuz he does, Muslims must and do hate us.
Crack open a Qur’an and read: 5.14, 5.64, 35.39 & 60.4
Racism?
Does Islam bring racism?? Death & Damnation! Open the third volume of “Mishkat Ul-Misabih” and read pages 117- 118. Allah created the Black race to burn: “for the fire”. Open “Muquaddimah” and see also pg 124 . You will find passages in which Ibn Khaldun declares certain Black African tribes to be suitable for slavery and nothing else.
Read also Sahih Bukhari 1.11.664.
Conquest?
Does Islam bring conquest? Read Surah Al-Anfal & Surah At-Taubah and try to deny it! How did Islam build an empire stretching from the border of France to the border of China?? [Click the heading above for more detailed evidence.]
Genocide?
Does Islam bring genocide? Open yer Qur’an to Surah Al-Anfal and read 8.67 “made a great slaughter”! Then turn to Surah Muhammad 47.4 “killed and wounded many of them”! See also 33.26 & Sahih Bukhari 4.52.280.
Terrorism?
Does Islam bring terrorism? Open yer Qur’an and read 3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220. Allah will and did "cast terror", Muslims must 'strike terror" & terrify and Moe was "more of a terror in the hearts of the Jews" & "made victorious with terror".[Click the heading above for more detailed evidence.]
I condemn & curse Islam on the basis of factual knowledge of its tenets: this is not bigotry. Islam tortures, kills and enslaves members of all races, for this I curse and condemn it; this is not racism. Islam is perpetual war, for this I curse and condemn it; this is not prejudice nor is it bigotry; it is common sense.
Islam declares in its Shari’ah, that I must be killed or enslaved for not being a Muslim, for this I condemn and curse it. Look it up, it is found in the second volume of Hedaya: pages 212…216.
Go to Hell, CAIR! Go directly to Hell, do not pass the White House and do not collect Jizya.
If you are a Cleric, administrator or jurist, a legislator or a candidate for high office who, knowing the fatal facts of Islam outlined above, refuse to expose, condemn & curse it, then Go to Hell, traitor to the human race!!!! May Satan seize such by their throats and drop with them into Hell!