State Of The Union: Haley Response

Nikki Haley ran for governor as a Tea Party candidate.  When I heard her  GOP Response to the State Of Confusion Address, I felt she'd converted to the Piss Party.  Her speech enraged me as much as Obamination's.

    I was working on my response to Obamination while listening to Haley, not really giving her much attention, so I sought a review. I found video at The Hill.  I found a trranscript at Time.

    Having viewed the video and read the transcript, I have selected key sentences, clauses and phrases which stand out like a boil on the ass of the party and highligted them for emphasis.


3:58 minutes  into the speech, the excrement hits the fan.

• And many of your frustrations are my frustrations.
• A frustration with a government that has grown day after day, year after year, yet doesn’t serve us any better. 
• A frustration with the same, endless conversations we hear over and over again. 
• A frustration with promises made and never kept.

    Haley assures us that she recognizes and shares our frustration with expanding bureaucracy, endless repetition of propaganda and unkept promises.  She knows that the party base is outraged and why.  

• We as Republicans need to own that truth. 
• We need to recognize our contributions to the erosion of the public trust in America’s leadership. 
• We need to accept that we’ve played a role in how and why our government is broken

    She  appears to toss a bone to be base, but pulls it back on a string of guilt: which belongs to the party bosses, not to the base. Bush lied: "no new taxes" . Thousands died and Shrub lied: "great religion of peace".  

    They told us they could not resist the 'crat juggernaut  'cuz  the 'crats held both houses of Congress and the Presidency.  We gave them the House and they told us they could not stand up to the  'crats 'cuz they needed the Senate, too.  We gave them the Senate and they folded like a house of cards for fear of "shutting down the government".  

    Yes, the voters of Ohio share some guilt 'cuz they kept John Boehner in office.  The voters of  Kentucky  share some guilt 'cuz they kept Mitch McConnel in office. I plead not guilty: I never voted for either of those disgusting RINOs.  

• During anxious times, it can be tempting to follow the siren call of the angriest voices. 

        Haley is carrying the piss bucket for Bush,  Boehner/Ryan & McConnel and dumping it on Donald J. Trump & Senator Ted Cruz. We caught the splatter.

    Must be she is only frustrated, not angry  or not voicing her anger. Or is she only angry at Trump for crashing through the PC barrier, opening a gap which Dr. Carson and Senator Cruz passed through, leaving Bush on the other side?

• We must resist that temptation.
• No one who is willing to work hard, abide by our laws, and love our traditions should ever feel unwelcome in this country.

    The new wave of Muslim  immigrants are not willing to work hard, there are no jobs for us, let alone them and they come to suck  jizya through the welfare teat, which will drain our pockets.  

    They hate our traditions:Christianity, liberty, equality & representative government.  They ain't welcome!

• And in this age of terrorism, we must not let in refugees whose intentions cannot be determined.

    Am I the only one who perceives the blatant contradiction?  Only by knowing that they are Muslims, obligated by their deity to conquer us, can we gage their intentions.  Because of al-taqeyya & Kitman, we can not trust their representations.  Because one of them has already perpetrated a terror attack and others have been arrested for plotting attacks,  our suspicions are confirmed.

• I have no doubt that if we act with proper focus, we can protect our borders, our sovereignty and our citizens, all while remaining true to America’s noblest legacies.

America’s noblest legacies

    That echoes Obamination's "best in us", click the link to see how I dissected that turd. We  have been  scolded that objecting to the admission of an enemy fifth column conflicts with the ideals enshrined in the Declaration Of Independence.

• We didn’t turn against each other’s race or religion. We turned toward God, and to the values that have long made our country the freest and greatest in the world.

    Roof's white skin and supposed Christian religion are irrelevant to his crime. He is obviously insane and addled by sumptuary substances.  His unconscionable act  does not reflect White Christian Americans.  

    Syed Farook and his immigrant wife were motivated to slaughter 14 innocent people by the damnable doctrines enshrined in the Qur'an & hadith. They showed us what Islam is & Muslims do; why the rest of them should be kept out.  Our ideals & values are not in conflict with   excluding inimical predators.

• Some people think that you have to be the loudest voice in the room to make a difference.

    That is  obviously a swipe at Trump , Carson & Cruz.  It is an unwarranted  swing of the piss bucket which does not belong in the state of the union response.

    Trump, a 'crat opportunist masquerading as a Conservative, is saying what the party base longs to hear, singing their  lyrics but, like all 'crats & RINOs,  promises gold and will deliver shit.  

    To make a difference and restore the  Constitution, we need to elect genuine Conservatives to replace the 'crats, CINOs & RINOs in congress and the white house.  

• And as we usher in this new era, Republicans will stand up for our beliefs.

    That would be a first, a real novel occurrence, one for the record books.

• We would respect differences in modern families, but we would also insist on respect for religious liberty as a cornerstone of our democracy.

    Bringing Queers into the state of the union response is a new low.   Religious liberty is for people who practice religions, not participants in perpetual war crimes.  Islam & Muslims do not fit under the penumbra of free exercise clause protection. There is no right to conquer, enslave, plunder & rape.

Real Measures To Eliminate International Terrorism

<head> <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="content-type"> <title>Eliminate Int. Terr. 12-16-13</title> Measures to eliminate international terrorism
A/RES/68/119, passed by the United Nations General Assembly  December 16, 2013 without a vote.

    After reaffirming a slew of prior resolutions and insincere condemnations of terrorism, the last paragraph on page 2 offers an obtuse and opaque hint at the root of the problem, conflicting with those previous resolutions.. [Emphasis added.]

A/RES/60/288

Reaffirming also that terrorism cannot and should not be associated with any
religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group,

A/RES/66/282

Reaffirming that terrorism cannot and should not be associated with any
religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group,

Emphasizing that tolerance and dialogue among civilizations and the
enhancement of interfaith and intercultural understanding are among the most
important elements in promoting cooperation and success in combating terrorism,
and welcoming the various initiatives to this end,

Terrorism can not be associated with Islam

    That declaration is a prime example of Political Correctness: "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."[Wikiquote]

    Turds do not have clean ends and terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam. 

• religion
• civilization
• Dialogue among civilizations and understanding:
  
• interfaith
• intercultural
• Most important elements in combating terrorism.
  

    When we put the critical elements of the two paragraphs together for comparison, cognitive dissonance is clearly recognizable. If there is no causal relationship between religion and terrorism, how can interfaith understanding combat terrorism? 

terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam

    Allah said that he would "cast terror". Allah cast terror, plundering Jewish settlements.  Allah told Moe that he terrified the Jews more than Allah did.  Moe said that he was made victorious by terror.

    Allah commanded Muslims to treat defeated victims harshly to terrorize those to be attacked next.  Allah commanded Muslims to maximize their military strength to terrify prospective victims.

Terror in modern Islamic strategy

    Brig. S.K. Malik wrote The Qur'anic Concept of War as a training manual for the army of Pakistan.  His analysis will help you to comprehend their strategy. Terror is both a means and an end.  This paragraph comes from the bottom of page 59. [Emphasis added.]

Terror struck into the hearts of the enemies is not only
a means, it is the end in itself. Once a condition of terror into
the opponent's heart is obtained, hardly anything is left to be
achieved. It is the point where the means and the end meet
and merge. Terror is not a means of imposing decision upon
the enemy; it is me decision we wish to impose upon him.

Allah hu Akbar!

    That is what they say when they sacrifice hadi at Eid. It is also what they said when they slit the throats of the flight crews.  Yes, they sacrificed the flight crews to Satan, but there is more, as Mohammed Atta commanded the hijackers in his final instructions.

Shout, 'Allahu Akbar,' because this strikes fear in the hearts of the non-believers. God said: 'Strike above the neck, and strike at all of their extremities.' Know that the gardens of paradise are waiting for you in all their beauty, and the women of paradise are waiting, calling out, 'Come hither, friend of God.' They have dressed in their most beautiful clothing. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2001/sep/30/terrorism.september113

He told them to shout the Takbir because it strikes fear. He cited 8.12 in which Allah promised to cast terror. He alluded to the whores of Allah's celestial bordello which are promised to those who fight in his cause, killing and being killed and the upgrade available to those who take any step to enrage or injure disbelievers. .

terrorize you

    Khalid Sheikh Mohammad and his four co-conspirators had a few things to say about terrorism in their Response To The Nine Accusations.

So, if our act of Jihad and our fighting with you caused fear and terror, then many thanks
to God, because it is him that has thrown fear into your hearts, which resulted in your infidelity,
paganism, and your statement that God had a son and your trinity beliefs.

Why are those vermin still alive and eating on our dime?

So, our religion is a religion of fear and terror to the enemies of God: the Jews, Christians, and pagans.
With God's wiling, we are terrorists to the bone. So, many thanks to God.
The Arab poet, Abu-Ubaydah AI-Hadrami, has stated: ((We will terrorize you, as long as we live with
swords, fire, and airplanes.))

Why are those vermin not burning in Hell?

We ask to be near to God, we fight you and destroy you and terrorize you. The Jihad in god's cause is a
great duty in our religion. We have news for you, the news is: You will be greatly defeated in
Afghanistan and Iraq and that America will fall, politically, militarily, and economically. Your end is very
near and your fall will be just as the fall of the towers on the blessed 9/11 day. We will raise from the
ruins, God willing. We will leave this imprisonment with our noses raised high in dignity, as the lion
emerges from his den. We shall pass over the blades of the sword into the gates of heaven.
So we ask from God to accept our contributions to the great attack, the great attack on America, and to
place our nineteen martyred brethren among the highest peaks in paradise.
God is great and pride for God, the prophet, and the believers

Why are Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Pakistan & Saudi Arabia still polluting the face of the earth and infesting the world with vermin?

   
    Why did Presidents Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Shrub & Obama mislead the nation, lie to us about the identity and character of the enemy and obfuscate the breadth, depth and intensity of the existential threat it poses to Liberty?

    Why does the United Nations commit treason against the human race by obfuscating the source of genocidal, terrorist Jihad?  If they sincerely wanted to combat international terrorism, they would take measures to eradicate Islam from the face of the earth. They would seek means of causing mass apostasy
among the Ummah al-Islamiyya.  Instead they seek to shield Islam from exposure; to shield it  by criminalizing all questioning and criticism of its damnable doctrines and practices.

    This video illustrates the basics of Jihad, it is a clue for you.

    This longer video demonstrates the deceptions of  Blair, Cameron, Obamination & Shrub.
While it conflates hadith with Qur'an, it is conceptually accurate.


    Citizens of the USA can use this on line petition to inform their Congressmen and Senators of Islam's egregious violations of international human rights conventions and demand their enforcement which requires that Islam be proscribed by law for promoting war and genocide. When you sign it, it will email itself to Congress. 

    Europeans can not sign the petition, they should email a link to their MP & MEP instead. 

---

• 3.151We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve...
• Allah next conveys the good news that He will put fear of the Muslims, and feelings of subordination to the Muslims in the hearts of their disbelieving enemies,
• http://www.altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=74&tSoraNo= 3&tAyahNo= 151&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0
• The promise of casting awe and fear into the hearts of the disbelievers in this verse was made in the background of the battle of Uhud when the disbelievers of Arabia marched back to Makkah without any obvious reason and inspite of defeat overtaking Muslims (Baydawi).[Marfiful Qur'an 2.214]
• 8:12. (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, "Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes." 
• I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved.) means, `you -- angels -- support the believers, strengthen their (battle) front against their enemies, thus, implementing My command to you. I will cast fear, disgrace and humiliation over those who defied My command and denied My Messenger
• I shall cast terror, fear, into the hearts of the disbelievers; ...
• ...I am going to cast terror into the hearts of disbelievers....
  
• 33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives. 
• ......and cast terror into their hearts;) means fear, because they had supported the idolators in their war against the Messenger of Allah and the one who knows is not like the one who does not know....
• ... He cast terror into their hearts, [so that] some, of them, you slew, and these were the combatants, and some, of them, you took captive, namely, their children.
• t was said that Allah  had, by putting the awe of the Holy Prophet and his Muslim followers into the hearts of the people of the Book who had helped the Confederate forces, made them come down from their strong fortresses and had thus made Muslims the inheritors of their
  properties, homes and areas of concentration.
• 59.2. He it is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Banî An-Nadîr) from their homes at the first gathering. You did not think that they would get out. And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from Allâh! But Allâh's (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they expected it not, and He cast terror into their hearts, so that they destroyed their own dwellings with their own hands and the hands of the believers. Then take admonition, O you with eyes (to see). 
• ...Allah cast fear, terror and fright in their hearts, and why would that not happen to them He who was given victory, by Allah frightening his enemies the distance of a month, laid siege to them....
• ... and He cast terror (ru‘b or ru‘ub) into their hearts, by having their chief Ka‘b b. al-Ashraf slain.
• ...So, some of the blessed Companions, in order to anger them or cast terror into their hearts, cut and burned down some of their date trees.... .
• 59.13.Verily, you (believers in the Oneness of Allâh - Islâmic Monotheism) are more awful as a fear in their (Jews of Banî An-Nadîr) breasts than Allâh. That is because they are a people who comprehend not (the Majesty and Power of Allâh). 
• ...Verily, you are more fearful in their breasts than Allah.) meaning, the hypocrites fear you more than they fear Allah...
• You indeed arouse greater awe, fear, in their hearts...
• Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month's journey.
• Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220 ...I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy...
• 8.57 . So if you gain the mastery over them in war, punish them severely in order to disperse those who are behind them, so that they may learn a lesson.
• ...then disperse those who are behind them,) by severely punishing ﴿the captured people﴾ according to Ibn `Abbas, Al-Hasan Al-Basri, Ad-Dahhak, As-Suddi, `Ata' Al-Khurasani and Ibn `Uyaynah. This Ayah commands punishing them harshly and inflicting casualties on them. This way, other enemies, Arabs and non-Arabs, will be afraid and take a lesson from their end,...
• ...[deal with them so as to] cause those, fighters, behind them to scatter, to disperse, by making an example of them and punishing them, so that they, the ones behind them, might remember, [that they might] take heed from their example.
• ...which essentially means to drive out or scatter away. So, the verse means: 'If you overpower such people in a war, give them a drastic punishment which becomes an instant lesson for others - so that those who are busy bashing Islam behind the cover of such people serving as their agent provacateurs should understand clearly that there remains no alternative for them but to run for their lives. The drive of the instruction is that these people should be punished in a manner which makes an impression on the disbelievers of Makkah and other hostile tribes and sucks away any courage they may have to come back and confront Muslims in the future....
• 8.60 .And make ready against them all you can of power, including steeds of war (tanks, planes, missiles, artillery, etc.) to threaten the enemy of Allâh and your enemy, and others besides whom, you may not know but whom Allâh does know. And whatever you shall spend in the Cause of Allâh shall be repaid unto you, and you shall not be treated unjustly.
• ...that thereby you may dismay, terrify, the enemy of God and your enemy, namely, the disbelievers of Mecca, and others besides them, that is, other than those — namely, the hypocrites or the Jews, whom you know not...
• ...The purpose, in fact, is to bring down the force of Kufr and Shirk and fill the hearts of their protagonists with awe so that they stay suppressed....
• The murder of Ka‘b b. al-Ashraf put the Jews of Medina in fear for their lives. The murder of Asma Bint Marwan so terrified one Arab tribe that they converted to Islam. Follow these links to the details in The Life of Muhammad.
  
• http://archive.org/stream/IbnIshaq-SiratuRasulAllah-translatorA.Guillaume/IbnIshaq-SiratRasulAllah#page/n206/mode/1up
• http://archive.org/stream/IbnIshaq-SiratuRasulAllah-translatorA.Guillaume/IbnIshaq-SiratRasulAllah#page/n362/mode/1up
• Allah demanded "great slaughter" as the price of Moe's admission to his celestial bordello, commanding Moe to kill and wound "many of them" before holding hostages for ransom. If that ain't genocidal, what the Hell is? 
• Terrorism is not limited to bombings, hijackings and fragings; all Jihad is terrorism because Islamic barbarism is intended to terrify potential victims so that they will be less likely to offer effective resistance to attack. See the tafsir related to  8.57.
  

Obamination: Resign! Resign!! Resign!!!

  A rapidly growing segment of the American electorate is outraged by the malfeasance of Obamination and misfeasance of those who should have resisted his suicidal policies in Congress. 

    We who are outraged need a means of collective and individual expression that will let us know that we are not alone in our suffering and outrage.  We need a way to testify to our fellow citizens that we are outraged and want the ship of state set aright on a course away from the maelstrom of destruction which is Obamination. 

    We need a way to tell our contemptible demagogues that we recognize what they are and are finished with them; that we disrespectfully demand their resignations, expressing our lack of confidence in and contempt for them. 

Resign! Resign!! Resign!!!  is a new Facebook group that can give us the voice we need. 

• If you are fed up with the lies, racism, class warfare propaganda and malignant malarkey flowing from Obamination, please join this group and add your friends.     
• If you are fed up with rules of engagement that cost precious American lives in Afghanistan, join this group and add your friends. 
• If you are fed up with a President who anal osculates the enemy, join this group and add your friends. 
• If you are fed up with losing your job and being unable to replace it, join this group and add your friends.
• If you are fed up with the high price of fuel & food, join this group and add your friends.
• If you are fed up with losing the equity in your home, join this group and add your friends.
• If you are fed up with the threat of impending forclosure, join this group and add your friends.
• If you are fed up with the escalating erosion of your investments, join this group and add your friends. 

    The group's statement is reproduced below with one minor change. One word has been bowdlerized, it is indicated by bold italic type face.  Most readers will easily guess the real word. 

This group is an open demand directed to President Obama, his appointees & assigns, the timid Republican leadership in the House of Representatives and every Congressman & Senator who voted for or failed to stand firm against Stimulus, Son of Stimulus,  TARP and Obama Don't Care. 

We have no confidence in your ability, skill, will or desire to lead this nation. We have no faith in your fidelity or trustworthiness. We consider you part of the problem, not part of the solution. We disrespectfully demand your immediate resignations.

You are feces. Many of you can and will be flushed in November of next year. Why wait?  Flush yourselves now; limit the stink.

Resign! Resign!! Resign!!!  http://www.facebook.com/groups/144597398957614/

Free Speech Has No Future

Cass Sunstein: The Future of free Speech, serialized in Little Mag, should serve as a warning of things to come if Obamination remains in power or is succeeded by another Socialist.  

    Sunstein discusses the concept of public forums, finding them crucial to our form of government. He hints at considering the means of communication as a public good.  Its a long way from Hyde Park to the internet, but Sunstein wants to conflate them. Examine his central concern.

"In a system with public forums and general interest intermediaries, people will frequently come across materials that they would not have chosen in advance – and for diverse citizens, this provides something like a common framework for social experience."

    In a small village, a single newspaper may serve as the local news source. One church, one fraternity, one school, one theatre  and one coffee shop may give the villagers shared experiences. But the USA is a great nation, not a small village.  There are many different institutions and services.  There are numerous newspapers, radio and television broadcasters, with divergent points of view and market niches.

    Consumers can and do choose, and "birds of a feather flock together", that is the way nature works.  Once the nation stared at Chronkite or Brinkley, and soaked up the same lies together.  Now we soak up lies from many different sources.

"All too many people are now exposed to louder echoes of their own voices, resulting, on occasion, in social fragmentation, misunderstanding, and sometimes even enmity. Perhaps it is better for people to hear fewer controversial views than for them to hear a single such view, stated over and over again. I now turn to this issue."

    Does Sunstein want to force Liberals to listen to Rush Limbaugh and watch Fox News?  Yeah, right.  I have sampled Randy Rhodes, John Hightower, Larry King and others. They raise my blood pressure too much. Keith Olbermann would make my bladder burst. I'll continue to listen to Rush, Sean & Mark; if Cass disapproves, he can go to Hell.

"If greater communications choices produce greater extremism, society may, in many cases, be better off as a result. But when group discussion tends to lead people to more strongly held versions of the same view with which they began, and if social influences and limited argument pools are responsible, there is legitimate reason for concern."

    "Extremism in the defense of liberty..." What is the value in arbitrarily decreasing the intensity or changing the direction of our views? This is all about cementing Scialists in power.

"Consider discussions among hate groups on the Internet and elsewhere. If the underlying views are unreasonable, it makes sense to fear that these discussions may fuel increasing hatred and a socially corrosive form of extremism."

    Who is to judge what 'views' are 'unreasonable'?  Here come the thought police!

"This does not mean that the discussions can or should be regulated in a system dedicated to freedom of speech. But it does raise questions about the idea that “more speech” is necessarily an adequate remedy – especially if people are increasingly able to wall themselves off from competing views."

    What is the remedy?

"The basic issue here is whether something like a “public sphere,” with a wide range of voices, might not have significant advantages over a system in which isolated consumer choices produce a highly fragmented speech market."

    Should we be like a doctatorship with state run media feeding us a steady diet of propaganda? 

"The most reasonable conclusion is that it is extremely important to ensure that people are exposed to views other than those with which they currently agree, in order to protect against the harmful effects of group polarisation on individual thinking and on social cohesion."

    Yeah, that's the solution: remote controlled idiot boxes blasting opinions inimical to our own, holding us as a captive audience!

"For those who believe that the free speech principle has democratic foundations, and is not about consumer sovereignty, government regulation of television, radio, and the Internet need not be objectionable, at least so long as it is reasonably taken as an effort to promote democratic goals."

    The free speech principle is crucial to our form of government. Voters must be allowed to communicate relevant facts and opinion and debate them openly in order to make wise decisions on candidates and related issues. 

    In deprecating 'consumer sovereignty', Sunstein deprecates popular sovereignty as well.  The people are sovereign, we give limited power to the government for limited  amd well defined purposes.  The popular sovereignty and consumer sovereignty are inseverable; if either is lost, both are lost. We can not be free if artificially & arbitrarily deprived of choices.

    Sunstein advocaztes mandates & disclosure reports for broadcasters including: educational programming, closed captioning, free airtime for office seakers, coverage of local issues and allowing opposition views to be heard.

    He does not stop there. he advocates requiring web sites to provide links to web sites with opposing views and "allow competing voices to be heard".

    Adding insult to injury, Sunstein advocates 'voluntary self-regulation'.  The variety of competing viewpoints might be reduced by "a ‘code’ of appropriate conduct".   The code would include, allowing opposing views, avoiding 'unnecessary' sensationalism and offering arguments rather than quick 'sound-bytes'. 

    The 'code ' would be "encouraged but not imposed by government".  If the 'code' is not 'voluntarily' implemented, the government "might impose “must carry” rules on highly partisan Websites".  So much for 'voluntary self-regulation'.  When you urinate on my shoes and tell me "its raining", you insult my intelligence.

    The Unfairness Doctrine is rising from the dead, in a disguised and expanded form.  It is all about squelching dissent under color of improving social intercourse.  They might as well limit us to one political party for the purpose of promoting 'common experience'm unity & social cohesion.

    LibTards kvetch about 'balkanization' while practicing the politics of division: pandering to Mexicans, Queers, abortion fanatics & Islam and engaging in class warfare.  There is something rotten in Washington: Obamination. Wise up, rise up, speak out and turn them out in the next election cycle!