It seems to me there’s only 3 sentences in the Qur’an that *might* be considered relatively harmless:
1. There is no compulsion in religion 2. to you your religion, to me, mine 3. If you kill one man, it is as if you killed all of mankind.
To dispel these myths, one must first read the very next lines LOL and then understand the doctrine of abrogation; i.e:
“Forget what I just said – allah can change his mind if he wants to, so from now on, when I say kill all the infidels until doomsday, I really mean it!”
It seems to me there’s only 3 sentences in the Qur’an that *might* be considered relatively harmless:
1. There is no compulsion in religion 2. to you your religion, to me, mine 3. If you kill one man, it is as if you killed all of mankind.
To dispel these myths, one must first read the very next lines LOL and then understand the doctrine of abrogation; i.e:
“Forget what I just said – allah can change his mind if he wants to, so from now on, when I say kill all the infidels until doomsday, I really mean it!”
Uncle Vladdie, the Shari'ah is the final word, the operative interpretation of what Moe preached.
The Qur'an was revealed in two places, under three dispensations, impotence, weakness and strength. As Moe accrued an army and it grew in numbers and confidence, his preaching became more and more aggressive.
Surah At-Taubah abrogates earlier, more passive and tolerant surahs.
Umdat al-Salik O9.8 cites At-Taubah 9.29 as its scriptural basis for the caliph waging war against Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians until they are subjugated and pay Jizya.
The Reliance of the Traveller O9.0 ... 14 and pages 140 ... 132, accessible through links in this post, stgand as probative evidence of the objective factual reality of Islamic conquest & extortion.
3 comments:
It seems to me there’s only 3 sentences in the Qur’an that *might* be considered relatively harmless:
1. There is no compulsion in religion
2. to you your religion, to me, mine
3. If you kill one man, it is as if you killed all of mankind.
To dispel these myths, one must first read the very next lines LOL and then understand the doctrine of abrogation; i.e:
“Forget what I just said – allah can change his mind if he wants to, so from now on, when I say kill all the infidels until doomsday, I really mean it!”
-”Allah” (Muhammad)-
;-)
It seems to me there’s only 3 sentences in the Qur’an that *might* be considered relatively harmless:
1. There is no compulsion in religion
2. to you your religion, to me, mine
3. If you kill one man, it is as if you killed all of mankind.
To dispel these myths, one must first read the very next lines LOL and then understand the doctrine of abrogation; i.e:
“Forget what I just said – allah can change his mind if he wants to, so from now on, when I say kill all the infidels until doomsday, I really mean it!”
-”Allah” (Muhammad)-
;-)
Uncle Vladdie, the Shari'ah is the final word, the operative interpretation of what Moe preached.
The Qur'an was revealed in two places, under three dispensations, impotence, weakness and strength. As Moe accrued an army and it grew in numbers and confidence, his preaching became more and more aggressive.
Surah At-Taubah abrogates earlier, more passive and tolerant surahs.
Umdat al-Salik O9.8 cites At-Taubah 9.29 as its scriptural basis for the caliph waging war against Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians until they are subjugated and pay Jizya.
The Reliance of the Traveller O9.0 ... 14 and pages 140 ... 132, accessible through links in this post, stgand as probative evidence of the objective factual reality of Islamic conquest & extortion.
Post a Comment